MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s002560050459

Медицинская библиотека · Skeletal radiology · 1998

A comparison of bone scintigraphy and MRI in the early diagnosis of the occult scaphoid waist fracture.

Fowler C, Sullivan B, Williams L A, McCarthy G, Savage R, Palmer A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of MRI in the assessment of the radiographically occult scaphoid fracture.

DESIGN

This prospective study compared the sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detection of radiographically occult scaphoid fractures with bone scintigraphy (BS), the currently accepted imaging modality of choice. Consecutive patients with clinical signs of a scaphoid injury but no evidence of fracture on plain radiographs at presentation and after 7-10 days were evaluated by MRI and BS. All images were reported in masked fashion and the sensitivities and specificities of the imaging modalities determined. All patients with a scaphoid fracture demonstrated by MRI or BS were followed for at least a year after injury.

PATIENTS: Forty-three subjects (aged 12-74 years) had both MRI and BS carried out on average 19 days from the injury date.

RESULTS AND

CONCLUSIONS

Six patients (14%) had scaphoid waist fractures. There were other bony injuries in a further six. In 40 patients there was agreement between the BS and MRI findings. In three cases there was discrepancy between the imaging modalities; in all three MRI was found to be the more sensitive and specific. MRI could become the investigation of choice for this injury.

Для цитирования: Fowler C, Sullivan B, Williams L A, McCarthy G, Savage R, Palmer A. A comparison of bone scintigraphy and MRI in the early diagnosis of the occult scaphoid waist fracture.. Skeletal radiology. 1998. DOI: 10.1007/s002560050459.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.