Anaphylaxis in children: Effect of age and atopic status.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening allergic reaction with rising incidence worldwide. Young children's limited ability to express symptoms adds unique diagnostic challenges.
OBJECTIVE
To study on anaphylaxis in children, including triggers, symptoms, treatment, atopic status impact, and adrenaline injection time intervals.
METHODS
In-patient medical records of children who were diagnosed with anaphylaxis during 2014-2021 were reviewed.
RESULTS
One hundred thirty-three anaphylaxis events were identified. Food (47%) was the most common trigger, followed by drugs (31%), blood components (17%), insects (3%), and idiopathic causes (2%). Ten cases of refractory anaphylaxis, 2 cases of biphasic reactions, and 1 case of persistent anaphylaxis were found. There were no reported fatalities. The most common presentations involved the skin (94%), followed by the respiratory (73%), gastrointestinal (47%), and cardiovascular (42%) systems. In atopic patients, wheezing was more prominent than in those without atopy (p-value = 0.017). In the non-atopic patients, there was a higher incidence of cardiovascular symptoms, particularly hypotension (p-value = 0.001), compared to individuals with atopy. Children under 5 years old with mild-moderate anaphylaxis required more time to reach the hospital (147.0 vs. 45.0 minutes, p = 0.033) and to receive adrenaline injections (35.0 vs. 9.0 minutes, p-value = 0.017) than those with severe anaphylaxis.
CONCLUSION
Childhood anaphylaxis is prevalent. Children with mild-moderate anaphylaxis experienced delays in hospital visits and adrenaline administration. Education on allergies is needed to improve the identification and prompt response to anaphylactic reactions, especially in young children.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.