MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ccd.23028

Медицинская библиотека · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2011

Electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias following percutaneous atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale device closure.

Johnson Jonathan N, Marquardt Michelle L, Ackerman Michael J, Asirvatham Samuel J, Reeder Guy S, Cabalka Allison K, Cetta Frank, Hagler Donald J

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To compare pre- and post-procedure electrocardiograms (ECGs) in a large cohort of patients after percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO).

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous device closure of ASD or PFO is commonplace. Conduction and rhythm anomalies associated with percutaneous device placement have been reported.

METHODS

We reviewed records for all patients who underwent percutaneous device closure of ASD or PFO at our institution from 1999 to 2008. Pre-procedure ECG and Holter studies were compared to available short term (<2 months after placement) and intermediate follow-up (>2 months) ECG or Holter.

RESULTS

Pre- and post-procedural ECGs were available in 610 patients (305 females, average age 50 ± 18.1 years, range 1-91 years, 384 PFO, 184 ASD, 42 with multiple defects, mean device size 16 mm, range 5-38 mm). We report an incidence of 5.2% (32/610) of arrhythmias in the 4 months following device placement, including 29 patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs, 22 fibrillation, 7 flutter), 1 with junctional tachycardia, and 2 with heart block. Among other findings, the average P-wave duration was increased on intermediate follow-up as compared to early follow-up (P < 0.001). Development of new-onset 1st degree AV Block after the procedure was associated with an increased risk of ATs post-procedure (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We report a low risk of clinically significant post-procedure arrhythmias after device placement. Clinically significant heart block occurred in only two patients (0.3%). Changes in several markers of atrial conduction were found, suggesting an effect of device closure on intra-atrial conduction.

Для цитирования: Johnson Jonathan N, Marquardt Michelle L, Ackerman Michael J, Asirvatham Samuel J, Reeder Guy S, Cabalka Allison K, Cetta Frank, Hagler Donald J. Electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias following percutaneous atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale device closure.. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2011. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23028.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.