Safety and efficacy of ischial spine fascia and sacrospinous ligament fixation for symptomatic stage 2 and 3 apical prolapse.

OBJECTIVE

To compare safety, efficacy, and impact on quality of life (QoL) between ischial spine fascia fixation (ISFF) and sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) for stage 2-3 pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHOD: A prospective cohort study among women with POP attending a national referral university hospital in Beijing, China, between May 2007 and May 2015. Women underwent either ISFF or SSLF. Primary end point was objective success rates at 3 months after surgery. Exploratory outcomes included perioperative parameters, complications, subjective satisfaction rates and QoL at 1 year.

RESULTS

There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the groups (all P>0.05). After ISFF and SSLF, the objective success rate at 3 months was 100% and 98.1% (P>0.99), the recurrence rate at 1 year was 5.3% and 8.3% (P=0.266), and the subjective satisfaction rate at 1 year was 97.8% and 97.9%, respectively. Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12 scores improved significantly after ISFF. De novo urinary incontinence occurred for 5.3% and 6.3% of women, respectively, and de novo dyspareunia for approximately 14% of women in both groups.

CONCLUSION

ISFF was found to be a safe and effective alternative to SSLF for women with symptomatic stage 2 and 3 POP.