MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/jp.2016.116

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016

Clinical impact of term-equivalent magnetic resonance imaging in extremely low-birth-weight infants at a regional NICU.

Melbourne L, Chang T, Murnick J, Zaniletti I, Glass P, Massaro A N

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical impact of routine term-equivalent magnetic resonance imaging (TE-MRI) for extremely low-birth-weight infants at a regional neonatal intensive care unit.

STUDY

DESIGN

This is a single-center retrospective study evaluating preterm survivors who underwent TE-MRI. MRI abnormalities were compared between infants with and without cranial ultrasonography (CUS) abnormalities. Cost analysis comparing imaging modalities was also performed.

RESULTS

TE-MRI use increased from 17% in 2006 to 76% in 2010. MRI detected new findings in nearly half of infants, whether or not they had known ultrasound abnormalities. MRI detected more cerebellar (18% vs 6%, P=0.04) and moderate white matter injury (12% vs 7%, P<0.001), and altered simulated neurological prognosis across developmental domains. The cost of TE-MRI was $1600, which was comparable to serial CUSs.

CONCLUSION

TE-MRI detects new abnormalities and impacts developmental prognosis in the extremely low birth weight, which supports its use despite the added financial cost.

Для цитирования: Melbourne L, Chang T, Murnick J, Zaniletti I, Glass P, Massaro A N. Clinical impact of term-equivalent magnetic resonance imaging in extremely low-birth-weight infants at a regional NICU.. Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association. 2016. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2016.116.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.