Neurology · 2023
Pathogenic RHEB Somatic Variant in a Child With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Without Pathogenic Variants in TSC1 or TSC2.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Wei Shern, Macdonald-Laurs Emma, Stephenson Sarah, D'Arcy Colleen, Maixner Wirginia, Harvey A Simon, Lockhart Paul J, Leventer Richard J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To describe a child meeting diagnostic criteria for tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) carrying a pathogenic somatic variant in RHEB, but no pathogenic variants in the 2 known TSC genes, TSC1 or TSC2.
METHODS: We present the clinical and imaging findings in a child presenting with drug-resistant focal seizures and multiple cortical tubers, a subependymal giant cell astrocytoma and multiple subependymal nodules in 1 cerebral hemisphere. Targeted panel sequencing and exome sequencing were performed on genomic DNA derived from blood and resected tuber tissue.
RESULTS: The child satisfied clinical diagnostic criteria for TSC, having 3 major features, only 2 of which are required for diagnosis. Genetic testing did not identify pathogenic variants or copy number variations in TSC1 or TSC2 but identified a pathogenic somatic RHEB variant (NM_005614.4:c.104_105delACinsTA [p.Tyr35Leu]) in the cortical tuber.
DISCUSSION: RHEB is a partner of the TSC1/2 complex in the mechanistic target of rapamycin pathway. Somatic variants in RHEB are associated with focal cortical dysplasia and hemimegalencephaly. We propose that variants in RHEB may explain some of the genetically undiagnosed TSC cases and may be the third gene for TSC, or TSC3.
METHODS: We present the clinical and imaging findings in a child presenting with drug-resistant focal seizures and multiple cortical tubers, a subependymal giant cell astrocytoma and multiple subependymal nodules in 1 cerebral hemisphere. Targeted panel sequencing and exome sequencing were performed on genomic DNA derived from blood and resected tuber tissue.
RESULTS: The child satisfied clinical diagnostic criteria for TSC, having 3 major features, only 2 of which are required for diagnosis. Genetic testing did not identify pathogenic variants or copy number variations in TSC1 or TSC2 but identified a pathogenic somatic RHEB variant (NM_005614.4:c.104_105delACinsTA [p.Tyr35Leu]) in the cortical tuber.
DISCUSSION: RHEB is a partner of the TSC1/2 complex in the mechanistic target of rapamycin pathway. Somatic variants in RHEB are associated with focal cortical dysplasia and hemimegalencephaly. We propose that variants in RHEB may explain some of the genetically undiagnosed TSC cases and may be the third gene for TSC, or TSC3.