MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/00016489.2016.1153808

Медицинская библиотека · Acta oto-laryngologica · 2016

A critical review of 20 years of parotid gland surgery.

Knopf Andreas, Szyper Michael, Mansour Naglaa, Sonnenberg Jan, Hofauer Benedikt, Niedermeyer Hans

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Conclusion PG surgery provides sufficient radicality with a minimum of functional loss. Patient's outcome is associated with the reliable estimation of the lesional entity/dignity. Diagnostic approaches are required to determine morphological aspects, avoid unnecessary surgery, and to reliable identify primary carcinomas/occult metastases. Objectives The pre-operative assessment of parotid gland (PG) lesions is of major clinical impact, whilst surgery remains the diagnostic/therapeutic mainstay. There are still controversies about the distribution of entities, clinical course, functional outcome, and survival. Methods In total, 1211 patients were retrospectively analyzed for disease-related data. Differences were analyzed using the Chi-square/Fisher exact/unpaired student's t-test; survival by Kaplan-Meier. Results There were 946 benign and 265 malignant tumours. In primary PG malignancy the disease-free/overall survival was 78/127 months. Metastases into the PG demonstrated a decreased survival (67 months). Extended surgery was associated with post-operative facial nerve alteration. Extracapsular dissection and superficial parotidectomy did not show differences in the facial palsy rate.

Для цитирования: Knopf Andreas, Szyper Michael, Mansour Naglaa, Sonnenberg Jan, Hofauer Benedikt, Niedermeyer Hans. A critical review of 20 years of parotid gland surgery.. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2016. DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2016.1153808.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.