Journal of affective disorders · 2024
Examining the association of familial and social stress, trauma, and support on mood, anxiety, and behavioral symptoms and diagnoses in youth at risk for bipolar disorder and controls.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamali Masoud, Stapp Emma K, Fullerton Janice M, Ghaziuddin Neera, Hulvershorn Leslie, McInnis Melvin G, Mitchell Philip B, Roberts Gloria, Wilcox Holly C, Nurnberger John I
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Youth with a family history of bipolar disorder (At-Risk) have a higher risk of developing psychiatric disorders and experiencing environmental stressors than youth without such family history (Control). We studied the differential associations of familial and environmental factors on developing psychiatric diagnoses and symptoms, in At-Risk and Control youth.
METHODS: At-Risk and Control youth (N = 466, ages 9-22) were systematically assessed for severity of symptoms, psychiatric diagnoses, and self-reported measures of stress and social support. We tested the association of family history and measures of stress or support with symptom severity and diagnoses.
RESULTS: At-Risk youth had higher symptom severity scores and were more frequently diagnosed with psychiatric disorders (all p values < 0.001). When predicting mood symptom severity, family history had an interaction effect with stressful life events (p < 0.001) and number of distinct traumatic events (p = 0.001). In multivariate models, At-Risk status predicted anxiety disorders (OR = 2.7, CI 1.3-5.4, p = 0.005) and anxiety severity (Coefficient = 0.4, CI 0.2-0.7, p < 0.001) but not mood or behavioral disorder diagnoses or severity.
LIMITATIONS: Measures of stress and social support were based on self-report. Not all participants had passed through the period of risk for developing the outcomes under study and the follow up period was variable. We could not fully study the differential impact of physical or sexual abuse due to low frequency of occurrence in controls.
CONCLUSION: At-Risk youth exhibit more severe mood symptoms compared to Controls when exposed to similar levels of stress or trauma. At-Risk youth are also more prone to develop anxiety which may be a precursor for bipolar disorder.
METHODS: At-Risk and Control youth (N = 466, ages 9-22) were systematically assessed for severity of symptoms, psychiatric diagnoses, and self-reported measures of stress and social support. We tested the association of family history and measures of stress or support with symptom severity and diagnoses.
RESULTS: At-Risk youth had higher symptom severity scores and were more frequently diagnosed with psychiatric disorders (all p values < 0.001). When predicting mood symptom severity, family history had an interaction effect with stressful life events (p < 0.001) and number of distinct traumatic events (p = 0.001). In multivariate models, At-Risk status predicted anxiety disorders (OR = 2.7, CI 1.3-5.4, p = 0.005) and anxiety severity (Coefficient = 0.4, CI 0.2-0.7, p < 0.001) but not mood or behavioral disorder diagnoses or severity.
LIMITATIONS: Measures of stress and social support were based on self-report. Not all participants had passed through the period of risk for developing the outcomes under study and the follow up period was variable. We could not fully study the differential impact of physical or sexual abuse due to low frequency of occurrence in controls.
CONCLUSION: At-Risk youth exhibit more severe mood symptoms compared to Controls when exposed to similar levels of stress or trauma. At-Risk youth are also more prone to develop anxiety which may be a precursor for bipolar disorder.