MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jhse.2007.06.013

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2007

Technical considerations and functional outcome of 22 major replantations (The BSSH Douglas Lamb Lecture, 2005).

Sabapathy S Raja, Venkatramani H, Bharathi R R, Dheenadhayalan J, Bhat V R, Rajasekaran S

LectureПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Twenty-two consecutive major replantations carried out over a 5-year period were assessed with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Only two patients suffered guillotine amputations. The remainders were either crush, or crush avulsion amputation. Replantation was successful in 20 cases. When analysed by Chen's criteria, there were three Grade I, nine Grade II, six Grade III and two Grade IV results. Most patients with successful replants put the hand to greater use with time and replantation greatly added to the overall well-being of the patient. We consider major replantation as a worthwhile procedure. Radical debridement, bone shortening and well laid out protocols to reduce the ischaemia time are important for success. The technical details which we believe to be important for success are outlined. With decreasing numbers of such injuries in most countries, this paper may help surgeons faced with an occasional patient with a major amputation to make the right decisions.

Для цитирования: Sabapathy S Raja, Venkatramani H, Bharathi R R, Dheenadhayalan J, Bhat V R, Rajasekaran S. Technical considerations and functional outcome of 22 major replantations (The BSSH Douglas Lamb Lecture, 2005).. The Journal of hand surgery, European volume. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhse.2007.06.013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.