Child abuse & neglect · 2024
Implementation of a digital health intervention for young people exposed to Technology Assisted Sexual Abuse.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Quayle Ethel, Schwannauer Matthias, Varese Filippo, Allsopp Kate, Cartwright Kim, Chan Cindy, Chitsabesan Prathiba, Green Victoria, Hewins William, Larkin Amanda, Newton Alice, Niebauer Erica, Radford Gillian, Richards Cathy, Sandys Marina, Shafi Sara, Ward Jennifer, Whelan Pauline, Bucci Sandra
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The internet has become a place of increased risk of abuse, including sexual abuse, for young people (YP). One potential risk factor to online abuse and exploitation is the ability to mentalise. We developed the i-Minds app, a mentalisation-based digital health intervention (DHI) for YP who have experienced technology assisted sexual abuse (TASA), which we tested in a clinical feasibility trial. Nested within the trial was a qualitative implementation study with clinicians who referred to the trial.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the barriers and enablers to the future integration of i-Minds into clinical practice.
PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Twelve HCPs were recruited from across two trial recruitment sites (Manchester and Edinburgh).
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were informed by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). Framework analysis was used; transcripts were coded deductively to NPT constructs.
RESULTS: Practitioners were positive about the need for, and added value of, the i-Minds app over existing interventions, including other DHIs. While they felt confident with the app, concerns remained around the safety of using the app without practitioner support. i-Minds promoted changes in practitioners' work and impacted online behaviour of YP. There was an identified need for further training and organisational support.
CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners are aware of TASA but have limited knowledge, skills and tools to work with TASA in clinical practice with YP. There is a need for awareness raising and education about TASA and DHI. i-Minds offers a theory-informed DHI for working with YP exposed to TASA that is acceptable to practitioners and YP.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the barriers and enablers to the future integration of i-Minds into clinical practice.
PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Twelve HCPs were recruited from across two trial recruitment sites (Manchester and Edinburgh).
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were informed by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). Framework analysis was used; transcripts were coded deductively to NPT constructs.
RESULTS: Practitioners were positive about the need for, and added value of, the i-Minds app over existing interventions, including other DHIs. While they felt confident with the app, concerns remained around the safety of using the app without practitioner support. i-Minds promoted changes in practitioners' work and impacted online behaviour of YP. There was an identified need for further training and organisational support.
CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners are aware of TASA but have limited knowledge, skills and tools to work with TASA in clinical practice with YP. There is a need for awareness raising and education about TASA and DHI. i-Minds offers a theory-informed DHI for working with YP exposed to TASA that is acceptable to practitioners and YP.