The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2020
Assessment of the Outcome of Calvarial Vault Remodeling and Spring-Mediated Cranioplasty in the Correction of Isolated Sagittal Suture Synostosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hassanein Ahmed Gaber, Fadle Khalid Nasser
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sagittal synostosis is the commonest form of nonsyndromic isolated craniosynostosis. Calvarial vault remodeling (CVR) and spring-mediated cranioplasty (SMC) are the commonly used correction techniques.
AIM OF THE WORK: To study and compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of CVR and SMC in the correction of isolated sagittal suture synostosis.
METHODS: A prospective cohort with the patients were divided into group; I (SMC) and II (CVR), each 15 patients. They were observed to evaluate the outcome and detect complications.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was 59.2 minutes in SMC and 184 minutes in CVR. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 26 mL in SMC and 64.7 mL in CVR. Intraoperative complications in SMC were dural tear in 1 patient and superior sagittal sinus injury in another patient, while in CVR 2 patients with dural tears and a 3rd with superior sagittal sinus injury. Postoperative complications in SMC were exposed spring, gaped wound, and parietal eminence elevation, while in CVR 2 patients needed blood transfusion. The mean hospital stays was 1.4 days in SMC and 4.1 days in CVR. In SMC, the relative increase in cephalic index varied between 5.5% and 8.2%, while for CVR, it varied between 5.1% and 7.9%.
CONCLUSION: The SMC and CVR are safe procedures, with good long-term results and significant objective changes toward normalization of the skull morphology in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis. The SMC is less invasive and associated with reduced hospital stays, decreased blood loss, and can be performed at a younger age than CVR with a lower morbidity.
AIM OF THE WORK: To study and compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of CVR and SMC in the correction of isolated sagittal suture synostosis.
METHODS: A prospective cohort with the patients were divided into group; I (SMC) and II (CVR), each 15 patients. They were observed to evaluate the outcome and detect complications.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was 59.2 minutes in SMC and 184 minutes in CVR. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 26 mL in SMC and 64.7 mL in CVR. Intraoperative complications in SMC were dural tear in 1 patient and superior sagittal sinus injury in another patient, while in CVR 2 patients with dural tears and a 3rd with superior sagittal sinus injury. Postoperative complications in SMC were exposed spring, gaped wound, and parietal eminence elevation, while in CVR 2 patients needed blood transfusion. The mean hospital stays was 1.4 days in SMC and 4.1 days in CVR. In SMC, the relative increase in cephalic index varied between 5.5% and 8.2%, while for CVR, it varied between 5.1% and 7.9%.
CONCLUSION: The SMC and CVR are safe procedures, with good long-term results and significant objective changes toward normalization of the skull morphology in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis. The SMC is less invasive and associated with reduced hospital stays, decreased blood loss, and can be performed at a younger age than CVR with a lower morbidity.