Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2025
Computed Tomography Scan Rates and Outcomes in Children Risk-Stratified Using the PREDICT Guideline Algorithm for Risk Stratification of Mild and Moderate Head Injuries.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hearps Stephen J C, Tavender Emma, Borland Meredith L, Oakley Ed, Grobler Anneke, Anderson Vicki, Barlow Karen M, Dalziel Stuart R, Phillips Natalie, Kochar Amit, Dalton Sarah, Furyk Jeremy, Neutze Jocelyn, Williams Amanda, Babl Franz E, Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT)
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Since 2021, the PREDICT Guideline for Mild to Moderate Head Injuries in Children has been widely implemented across Australia and New Zealand. We set out to describe the application of the guideline's risk stratification using an existing database.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of a large multicentre prospective data set of paediatric patients with head injuries. We stratified the sample into high, intermediate, low, and very low risk categories per the PREDICT Guideline algorithm. Rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of computed tomography (CT), abnormal CT, and clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) were determined within these categories.
RESULTS: Of 20,137 patients, 1847 were excluded from risk stratification as requiring immediate CT scans (GCS ≤ 13) or as special conditions. 18,290 (90.8%) were stratified into risk categories: 542 (2.9%) high, 4843 (26.0%) intermediate, 2138 (11.5%) low, and 10,767 (57.9%) very low. CT rates were 59.2% (95% CI 55.0%-63.4%) and 18.9% (17.8%-20.1%) in high and intermediate risk groups, with subsequent abnormal CT rates of 42.1% (95% CI 36.6%-47.7%) and 17.6% (95% CI 15.1%-20.2%), and ciTBI rates of 8.9% (95% CI 6.6%-11.6%) and 1.3% (95% CI 1.0%-1.6%), respectively. CT rates were 7.1% (95% CI 6.1%-8.3%) and 1.8% (95% CI 1.6%-2.1%) for low and very low risk groups, with ciTBI rates of 0.4% (95% CI 0.2%-0.8%) and 0.01% (95% CI 0.0002%-0.1%). 9 low and 1 very low risk patient had a ciTBI (2 required neurosurgery).
CONCLUSIONS: The PREDICT Guideline algorithm risk stratifies head injuries into high, intermediate, low, and very low risk patients. Two of the missed lower risk patients required neurosurgery.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of a large multicentre prospective data set of paediatric patients with head injuries. We stratified the sample into high, intermediate, low, and very low risk categories per the PREDICT Guideline algorithm. Rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of computed tomography (CT), abnormal CT, and clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) were determined within these categories.
RESULTS: Of 20,137 patients, 1847 were excluded from risk stratification as requiring immediate CT scans (GCS ≤ 13) or as special conditions. 18,290 (90.8%) were stratified into risk categories: 542 (2.9%) high, 4843 (26.0%) intermediate, 2138 (11.5%) low, and 10,767 (57.9%) very low. CT rates were 59.2% (95% CI 55.0%-63.4%) and 18.9% (17.8%-20.1%) in high and intermediate risk groups, with subsequent abnormal CT rates of 42.1% (95% CI 36.6%-47.7%) and 17.6% (95% CI 15.1%-20.2%), and ciTBI rates of 8.9% (95% CI 6.6%-11.6%) and 1.3% (95% CI 1.0%-1.6%), respectively. CT rates were 7.1% (95% CI 6.1%-8.3%) and 1.8% (95% CI 1.6%-2.1%) for low and very low risk groups, with ciTBI rates of 0.4% (95% CI 0.2%-0.8%) and 0.01% (95% CI 0.0002%-0.1%). 9 low and 1 very low risk patient had a ciTBI (2 required neurosurgery).
CONCLUSIONS: The PREDICT Guideline algorithm risk stratifies head injuries into high, intermediate, low, and very low risk patients. Two of the missed lower risk patients required neurosurgery.