Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2004
Prenatal diagnosis of a craniopharyngioma: a new case with radical surgery and review.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lonjon M, Dran G, Casagrande F, Vandenbos F, Mas J C, Richelme C
Аннотация
CASE REPORT: A case of the antenatal diagnosis of a craniopharyngioma with radical surgery in the neonatal period is reported.
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE: We have reviewed the literature of such cases in an attempt to isolate specific features in this age group and to determine the appropriate management. Only six cases of the truly antenatal diagnosis of craniopharyngiomas have been reported. Diagnosis has resulted from routine ultrasound during pregnancy or from polyhydramnios. Clinically, there is often macrocephaly due to hydrocephalus or a significant-sized tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: Management of these rare cases is controversial with high postoperative mortality and significant morbidity, including panhypopituitarism, visual disturbance, and neuropsychological disorders. From the available literature, no conclusions concerning the management can be drawn at present, due to the rarity of early surgical intervention. Our case, despite the lack of important follow-up, seems to confirm the possibility of attempting radical surgery in the neonatal period as a result of advances both in surgical techniques and in neonatal intensive care.
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE: We have reviewed the literature of such cases in an attempt to isolate specific features in this age group and to determine the appropriate management. Only six cases of the truly antenatal diagnosis of craniopharyngiomas have been reported. Diagnosis has resulted from routine ultrasound during pregnancy or from polyhydramnios. Clinically, there is often macrocephaly due to hydrocephalus or a significant-sized tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: Management of these rare cases is controversial with high postoperative mortality and significant morbidity, including panhypopituitarism, visual disturbance, and neuropsychological disorders. From the available literature, no conclusions concerning the management can be drawn at present, due to the rarity of early surgical intervention. Our case, despite the lack of important follow-up, seems to confirm the possibility of attempting radical surgery in the neonatal period as a result of advances both in surgical techniques and in neonatal intensive care.