International journal of laboratory hematology · 2023
Performance evaluation the new automated Atellica Hema 580 hematology analyzer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schapkaitz E, Baiden A, Raburabu S
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The Atellica Hema (Siemens Healthineers, Tarrytown, NY, USA) is a new generation multi-parameter analyzer for full blood count, 6-part differential and reticulocyte testing by impedance variation and fluorescence flow cytometry. In this study, we verified the whole blood and limited body fluid modes of the Atellica Hema 580.
METHODS: We evaluated precision, linearity, carry-over, throughput and performed a method comparison to assess the performance of the Atellica Hema 580. For comparison of the Atellica Hema 580 with the Sysmex XN-1000 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan), 140 samples from adult and pediatric patients including both normal and abnormal hematology profiles were analyzed in parallel.
RESULTS: The Atellica Hema 580 demonstrated acceptable imprecision within the manufacturer's specifications for whole blood and body fluid modes, good linearity for high and low ranges and no significant carryover. The full blood count, differential and reticulocyte correlated well with the Sysmex XN-1000, except for mean cell hemoglobin concentration, basophil and large immature cells. The optical platelet count, reflexed in 34 samples with a platelet count <150 × 109 /l, showed a strong correlation with the fluorescent platelet count on the Sysmex XN-1000. The morphology flagging efficiency was 92% for white blood cells, 95% for red blood cells and 87% for platelets.
CONCLUSION: The Atellica Hema 580 showed good analytical performance and workflow efficiency for a wide range of patient samples.
METHODS: We evaluated precision, linearity, carry-over, throughput and performed a method comparison to assess the performance of the Atellica Hema 580. For comparison of the Atellica Hema 580 with the Sysmex XN-1000 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan), 140 samples from adult and pediatric patients including both normal and abnormal hematology profiles were analyzed in parallel.
RESULTS: The Atellica Hema 580 demonstrated acceptable imprecision within the manufacturer's specifications for whole blood and body fluid modes, good linearity for high and low ranges and no significant carryover. The full blood count, differential and reticulocyte correlated well with the Sysmex XN-1000, except for mean cell hemoglobin concentration, basophil and large immature cells. The optical platelet count, reflexed in 34 samples with a platelet count <150 × 109 /l, showed a strong correlation with the fluorescent platelet count on the Sysmex XN-1000. The morphology flagging efficiency was 92% for white blood cells, 95% for red blood cells and 87% for platelets.
CONCLUSION: The Atellica Hema 580 showed good analytical performance and workflow efficiency for a wide range of patient samples.