Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery] · 2000
[Diagnostic value of arthrography and MRI in rotator cuff tears].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo A, Fujita K, Mizuno K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare arthrography with MRI to determine the sensitivity and specificity in detecting rotator cuff tear.
METHODS: 53 shoulders were studied. All patients underwent both arthrography and MRI. The results were compared with the findings of arthroscopy or open surgery.
RESULTS: The sensitivity in demonstrating partial-thickness tears was 70% for arthrography and 80% for MRI; the specificity was 75% for arthrography or MRI. The sensitivity in detecting full-thickness tears was 87% for arthrography and 90% for MRI, and the specificity was 100% for arthrography and 75% for MRI.
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of arthrography and MRI in detecting rotator cuff tears was identical. The specificity of arthrography in detecting full-thickness tears was higher that of MRI.
METHODS: 53 shoulders were studied. All patients underwent both arthrography and MRI. The results were compared with the findings of arthroscopy or open surgery.
RESULTS: The sensitivity in demonstrating partial-thickness tears was 70% for arthrography and 80% for MRI; the specificity was 75% for arthrography or MRI. The sensitivity in detecting full-thickness tears was 87% for arthrography and 90% for MRI, and the specificity was 100% for arthrography and 75% for MRI.
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of arthrography and MRI in detecting rotator cuff tears was identical. The specificity of arthrography in detecting full-thickness tears was higher that of MRI.