Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2019
Variation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in the United States: 2010 to 2015.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huetteman Helen E, Shauver Melissa J, Malay Sunitha, Chung Ting-Ting, Chung Kevin C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: It remains unknown whether treatment trends for distal radius fracture have changed in light of value-based care initiatives during recent years. The authors aimed to characterize modern practice patterns for distal radius fracture management.
METHODS: Truven MarketScan databases from 2009 to 2015 were used to extract demographic characteristics, geographic location, and comorbidities for patients receiving treatment for a distal radius fracture. Regression modeling and Joinpoint analysis were used to assess treatment trends and the association of patient factors with treatment provided.
RESULTS: Among 499,766 eligible encounters, the rate of internal fixation fluctuated around 13 percent. Casting/splinting remained the most frequent treatment across all populations. Treatment trends varied by age; children and adolescents almost exclusively received closed treatment (mean, 97 percent), yet rates of internal fixation increased among adults and elderly patients. Patients aged 55 to 64 years were most likely to undergo internal fixation (OR, 1.89; 95 percent CI, 1.82 to 1.96). Higher median household income also significantly increased odds of receiving internal fixation (p < 0.001). Despite declining rates of external fixation and percutaneous pinning, regional variations among surgical modalities persist.
CONCLUSIONS: The increased use of internal fixation for distal radius fractures may be slowing. Treatment type continues to differ widely across demographic groups, underscoring the need for standardization. In accordance with value-based care initiatives, treatment decisions should be made to combine patient needs with financial implications on the health system. Comparative effectiveness data to derive optimal management strategies are still warranted.
METHODS: Truven MarketScan databases from 2009 to 2015 were used to extract demographic characteristics, geographic location, and comorbidities for patients receiving treatment for a distal radius fracture. Regression modeling and Joinpoint analysis were used to assess treatment trends and the association of patient factors with treatment provided.
RESULTS: Among 499,766 eligible encounters, the rate of internal fixation fluctuated around 13 percent. Casting/splinting remained the most frequent treatment across all populations. Treatment trends varied by age; children and adolescents almost exclusively received closed treatment (mean, 97 percent), yet rates of internal fixation increased among adults and elderly patients. Patients aged 55 to 64 years were most likely to undergo internal fixation (OR, 1.89; 95 percent CI, 1.82 to 1.96). Higher median household income also significantly increased odds of receiving internal fixation (p < 0.001). Despite declining rates of external fixation and percutaneous pinning, regional variations among surgical modalities persist.
CONCLUSIONS: The increased use of internal fixation for distal radius fractures may be slowing. Treatment type continues to differ widely across demographic groups, underscoring the need for standardization. In accordance with value-based care initiatives, treatment decisions should be made to combine patient needs with financial implications on the health system. Comparative effectiveness data to derive optimal management strategies are still warranted.