MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.anplas.2010.10.016

Медицинская библиотека · Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique · 2011

[Poland's syndrome in women: Therapeutic indications according to the grade. Apropos of 11 cases and review of the literature].

Baratte A, Bodin F, Del Pin D, Wilk A, Bruant C

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Correction of chest and breast abnormalities in Poland's syndrome differs among authors. The aim of this study is to discuss surgical protocols according to the grade of Poland's syndrome in women.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

The authors present a series of 11 women with Poland's syndrome among which nine were operated. Several surgical techniques were used. Cosmetic results were analysed according to the treatment and grade. Median follow up is 9 years.

RESULTS

In grade I, a round breast implant seems to be the best choice. In grade II, a latissimus dorsi flap combined with a breast implant gives better results than a breast implant alone. In grade III, breast and chest reconstruction are linked. The authors present a case of costal reconstruction followed by an expansion without a latissimus flap.

CONCLUSION

Many authors recommend a latissimus flap combined with a breast implant in severe grades of Poland's syndrome. Using this flap is not always possible nor mandatory. According to soft tissue quality, expansion may be an alternative way or a temporary solution during growth.

Для цитирования: Baratte A, Bodin F, Del Pin D, Wilk A, Bruant C. [Poland's syndrome in women: Therapeutic indications according to the grade. Apropos of 11 cases and review of the literature].. Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2010.10.016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.