European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2008
Impact of capsule endoscopy on outcome in mid-intestinal bleeding: a multicentre cohort study in 285 patients.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Albert Jörg G, Schülbe Romy, Hahn Leonore, Heinig Detlef, Schoppmeyer Konrad, Porst Heiner, Lorenz Reinhard, Plauth Mathias, Dollinger Matthias M, Mössner Joachim, Caca Karel, Fleig Wolfgang E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) sensitively detects the bleeding source in the small bowel. However, the influence of CE on long-term outcome is not well established.
METHODS: In five tertiary hospitals, all CE investigations were retrospectively identified dating back to 3 years. Patients with intestinal bleeding and negative bidirectional endoscopy were included, and relapse of bleeding was recorded.
RESULTS: A bleeding source was detected in 219 of 285 patients (76.8%); CE provided the diagnosis in 175 of 219 (79.9%) and other, repeated investigations in 44 cases (20.1%). Follow-up (mean+/-SD=20.7+/-9.4 months) in 240 patients identified rebleeding in 65 (27.1%), and readmission to a hospital in 42 (17.5%). Hospital readmission was most frequent in patients with angiectasias (31.3%, relative risk (RR)=5.0; 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.4-10.4). Other risk factors included patients being older than 60 years of age (RR=3.8; 95% CI=1.5-9.5), and anticoagulant medication (RR=3.0; 95% CI=1.5-6.0). Therapeutic measures had a mean recurrence rate of 3.7% in surgical candidates (Meckel's diverticulum, tumor), 40% in endoscopically treated and 16% in medically treated patients. In case all the detected angiectasias had been cauterized, the relapse rate was low (11.8%), but in incompletely treated patients, it was high (85.7%). Bleeding relapse was never lethal.
CONCLUSION: CE guides therapeutic measures and predicts the risk of recurrent bleeding in small intestinal bleeding. High risk of rebleeding in angiectasias is significantly reduced by the cauterization of all demonstrable lesions.
METHODS: In five tertiary hospitals, all CE investigations were retrospectively identified dating back to 3 years. Patients with intestinal bleeding and negative bidirectional endoscopy were included, and relapse of bleeding was recorded.
RESULTS: A bleeding source was detected in 219 of 285 patients (76.8%); CE provided the diagnosis in 175 of 219 (79.9%) and other, repeated investigations in 44 cases (20.1%). Follow-up (mean+/-SD=20.7+/-9.4 months) in 240 patients identified rebleeding in 65 (27.1%), and readmission to a hospital in 42 (17.5%). Hospital readmission was most frequent in patients with angiectasias (31.3%, relative risk (RR)=5.0; 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.4-10.4). Other risk factors included patients being older than 60 years of age (RR=3.8; 95% CI=1.5-9.5), and anticoagulant medication (RR=3.0; 95% CI=1.5-6.0). Therapeutic measures had a mean recurrence rate of 3.7% in surgical candidates (Meckel's diverticulum, tumor), 40% in endoscopically treated and 16% in medically treated patients. In case all the detected angiectasias had been cauterized, the relapse rate was low (11.8%), but in incompletely treated patients, it was high (85.7%). Bleeding relapse was never lethal.
CONCLUSION: CE guides therapeutic measures and predicts the risk of recurrent bleeding in small intestinal bleeding. High risk of rebleeding in angiectasias is significantly reduced by the cauterization of all demonstrable lesions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAge FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsCapsule EndoscopesCapsule EndoscopyChildFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansIntestinal DiseasesIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient ReadmissionPrognosisRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityStomach UlcerTreatment Outcome