MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/aco.0b013e32816678a5

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2007

Correlating the clinical actions and molecular mechanisms of general anesthetics.

Solt Ken, Forman Stuart A

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize recent in-vitro and in-vivo research on molecular mechanisms of general anesthetics' actions.

RECENT FINDINGS: Classes of general anesthetics with distinct clinical profiles appear to induce amnesia, hypnosis, and immobility via different molecular targets. Propofol, etomidate, and barbiturates produce profound amnesia and hypnosis, but weak immobility, by enhancing the activity of specific gamma-aminobutyric acid typeA receptors. In contrast, nitrous oxide, xenon, and ketamine produce analgesia, but weak hypnosis and amnesia, by inhibiting glutamate and nicotinic receptors and activating potassium 'leak' channels such as TREK-1. Volatile halogenated anesthetics show little selectivity for molecular targets. They act on all the channels mentioned above, and other targets such as glycine receptors and mediators of neurotransmitter release.

SUMMARY: Several clinically distinct 'anesthetic states' are induced by different classes of drugs acting on neuronal circuits via different molecular targets. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic and toxic actions of general anesthetics helps us reframe the 'art' of anesthesia into more of a 'science'. These studies also enhance efforts to develop new drugs with improved clinical utility.

Для цитирования: Solt Ken, Forman Stuart A. Correlating the clinical actions and molecular mechanisms of general anesthetics.. Current opinion in anaesthesiology. 2007. DOI: 10.1097/aco.0b013e32816678a5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.