Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2006
Usefulness of nonbreath-hold 1-shot magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of choledochal cyst in children.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Suzuki Mitsuyoshi, Shimizu Toshiaki, Kudo Takahiro, Suzuki Ryuyo, Ohtsuka Yoshikazu, Yamashiro Yuichiro, Shimotakahara Akihiko, Yamataka Atsuyuki
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for the evaluation of choledochal cyst in children.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: MRCP was performed preoperatively in 33 patients. The MRCP findings were compared with those of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or intraoperative cholangiopancreatography.
RESULTS: In all 33 patients, MRCP could detect choledochal cyst. The detection rate of a cyst in the main pancreatic duct was 62.2%, of abnormal union of the pancreaticobiliary junction (AUPBJ) was 53.3%, of dilatation or abnormalities of the main pancreatic duct was 75.0% and of a protein plug or stone was 76.9%. In patients under 2 years of age (group A), these findings were significantly lower than those of patients above 2 years of age (group B) [main pancreatic duct: 16.6% (1/6) vs 73.1% (19/26), P < 0.01; AUPBJ: 0.0% (0/6) vs 66.7% (16/24), P < 0.05; and protein plug or stone: 0.0% (0/2) vs 90.9% (10/11), P < 0.05]. The detection rate of AUPBJ in the patients with fusiform dilatation was superior to that of those with cystic dilatation [70% (14/20) vs 20% (2/10), P < 0.05]. In the patients with fusiform dilatation, the detection rate in group A was significantly lower than that in group B [0.0% (0/3) vs 82.4% (14/17), P < 0.01]; however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the detection of cystic dilatation.
CONCLUSION: In patients older than 2 years, MRCP should be the first-choice method for confirming the diagnosis and for ensuring accurate visualization of the pancreaticobiliary system.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: MRCP was performed preoperatively in 33 patients. The MRCP findings were compared with those of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or intraoperative cholangiopancreatography.
RESULTS: In all 33 patients, MRCP could detect choledochal cyst. The detection rate of a cyst in the main pancreatic duct was 62.2%, of abnormal union of the pancreaticobiliary junction (AUPBJ) was 53.3%, of dilatation or abnormalities of the main pancreatic duct was 75.0% and of a protein plug or stone was 76.9%. In patients under 2 years of age (group A), these findings were significantly lower than those of patients above 2 years of age (group B) [main pancreatic duct: 16.6% (1/6) vs 73.1% (19/26), P < 0.01; AUPBJ: 0.0% (0/6) vs 66.7% (16/24), P < 0.05; and protein plug or stone: 0.0% (0/2) vs 90.9% (10/11), P < 0.05]. The detection rate of AUPBJ in the patients with fusiform dilatation was superior to that of those with cystic dilatation [70% (14/20) vs 20% (2/10), P < 0.05]. In the patients with fusiform dilatation, the detection rate in group A was significantly lower than that in group B [0.0% (0/3) vs 82.4% (14/17), P < 0.01]; however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the detection of cystic dilatation.
CONCLUSION: In patients older than 2 years, MRCP should be the first-choice method for confirming the diagnosis and for ensuring accurate visualization of the pancreaticobiliary system.