Archives of cardiovascular diseases · 2024
Bedside right ventricle quantification using three-dimensional echocardiography in children with congenital heart disease: A comparative study with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hadeed Khaled, Karsenty Clément, Ghenghea Ramona, Dulac Yves, Bruguiere Eric, Guitarte Aitor, Pyra Pierrick, Acar Philippe
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Accurate quantification of right ventricular (RV) volumes and function is crucial for the management of congenital heart diseases.
AIMS: We aimed to assess the feasibility and accuracy of bedside analysis using new RV quantification software from three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in children with or without congenital heart disease, and to compare measurements with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
METHODS: We included paediatric patients with congenital heart disease (106 patients) responsible for RV volume overload and a control group (30 patients). All patients underwent three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography using a Vivid E95 ultrasound system. RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and RV ejection fraction were obtained using RV quantification software. Measurements were compared between RV quantification and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in 27 patients.
RESULTS: Bedside RV quantification analysis was feasible in 133 patients (97.8%). Manual contour adjustment was necessary in 126 patients (93%). The mean time of analysis was 62±42s. RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were larger in the congenital heart disease group than the control group: median 85.0 (interquartile range 29.5) mL/m2 vs 55.0 (interquartile range 20.5) mL/m2 for RV end-diastolic volume and 42.5 (interquartile range 15.3) mL/m2 vs 29.0 (interquartile range 11.8) mL/m2 for RV end-systolic volume, respectively. Good agreement for RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and RV ejection fraction was found between RV quantification and magnetic resonance imaging measurements. RV quantification software underestimated RV end-diastolic volume/body surface area by 3mL/m2 and RV ejection fraction by 2.1%, and overestimated RV end-systolic volume/body surface area by 0.2mL/m2.
CONCLUSIONS: We found good feasibility and accuracy of bedside RV quantification analysis from three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in children with or without congenital heart disease. RV quantification could be a reliable and non-invasive method for RV assessment in daily practice, facilitating appropriate management and follow-up care.
AIMS: We aimed to assess the feasibility and accuracy of bedside analysis using new RV quantification software from three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in children with or without congenital heart disease, and to compare measurements with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
METHODS: We included paediatric patients with congenital heart disease (106 patients) responsible for RV volume overload and a control group (30 patients). All patients underwent three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography using a Vivid E95 ultrasound system. RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and RV ejection fraction were obtained using RV quantification software. Measurements were compared between RV quantification and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in 27 patients.
RESULTS: Bedside RV quantification analysis was feasible in 133 patients (97.8%). Manual contour adjustment was necessary in 126 patients (93%). The mean time of analysis was 62±42s. RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were larger in the congenital heart disease group than the control group: median 85.0 (interquartile range 29.5) mL/m2 vs 55.0 (interquartile range 20.5) mL/m2 for RV end-diastolic volume and 42.5 (interquartile range 15.3) mL/m2 vs 29.0 (interquartile range 11.8) mL/m2 for RV end-systolic volume, respectively. Good agreement for RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and RV ejection fraction was found between RV quantification and magnetic resonance imaging measurements. RV quantification software underestimated RV end-diastolic volume/body surface area by 3mL/m2 and RV ejection fraction by 2.1%, and overestimated RV end-systolic volume/body surface area by 0.2mL/m2.
CONCLUSIONS: We found good feasibility and accuracy of bedside RV quantification analysis from three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in children with or without congenital heart disease. RV quantification could be a reliable and non-invasive method for RV assessment in daily practice, facilitating appropriate management and follow-up care.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansHeart Defects, CongenitalEchocardiography, Three-DimensionalMaleFemaleVentricular Function, RightFeasibility StudiesChild, PreschoolChildPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsHeart VentriclesInfantStroke VolumePoint-of-Care TestingAdolescentImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedCase-Control StudiesVentricular Dysfunction, RightAge FactorsMagnetic Resonance Imaging