MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/01942638.2012.747584

Медицинская библиотека · Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics · 2012

Reliable classification of functional profiles and movement disorders of children with cerebral palsy.

Randall Melinda, Harvey Adrienne, Imms Christine, Reid Sue, Lee Katherine J, Reddihough Dinah

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To examine the inter-rater reliability of the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS), Bimanual Fine Motor Function (BFMF), Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE) classification tree, and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and periventricular white matter injury (PWMI) aged 4-11 years.

METHOD: Twenty children were assessed by two raters using the four tools, in addition parents undertook ratings on the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS). Kappa statistics were used to calculate the level of agreement between raters' classifications.

RESULTS

Participants comprised 12 males and 8 females with CP and PWMI, mean age 8 years 1 month (standard deviation 2 years 3 months). Inter-rater reliability across the four tools was 0.98 (CFCS, BFMF, and GMFCS) and 0.84 (SCPE).

IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that these four tools are reasonably robust to inter-rater variability supporting their routine use along with the MACS in clinical and research applications.

Для цитирования: Randall Melinda, Harvey Adrienne, Imms Christine, Reid Sue, Lee Katherine J, Reddihough Dinah. Reliable classification of functional profiles and movement disorders of children with cerebral palsy.. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics. 2012. DOI: 10.3109/01942638.2012.747584.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.