Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
Efficacy and Safety of DOACs for the Treatment of Superficial Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boccatonda Andrea, Brighenti Alice, Simion Chiara, Simioni Paolo, Campello Elena
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for superficial vein thrombosis (SVT), yet evidence remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes all available data on the efficacy and safety of DOACs in SVT.
METHODS: A systematic search identified randomized and observational studies enrolling adults with acute SVT treated with DOACs. Primary efficacy outcomes were venous thromboembolism (VTE: deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) and SVT recurrence/extension. Safety outcomes included major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB).
RESULTS: Six studies (n = 2,040; 602 DOAC-treated patients) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with fondaparinux, DOACs showed comparable short-term efficacy for VTE prevention (pooled risk ratio [RR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.44-1.99) and similar rates of SVT recurrence (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.65-2.62). Versus placebo, rivaroxaban reduced recurrence by approximately 80% (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03-1.35). In the pooled safety analysis including four studies, DOACs were associated with a 65% relative risk reduction in major or CRNMB compared with fondaparinux or low-molecular-weight heparin (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.15-0.83; I 2 = 0%). In the TROLL registry (n = 229; 74% DOAC), no major bleeding occurred among DOAC users, while 5-year cumulative VTE and SVT recurrence rates were each 15.9%. Certainty of evidence was moderate for efficacy and high for safety.
CONCLUSION: DOACs demonstrate efficacy comparable to fondaparinux and an excellent safety profile in SVT, supporting their use as a practical oral alternative. Long-term data indicate persistent thrombotic risk, suggesting potential benefit of extended low-dose prophylaxis in selected high-risk patients.
METHODS: A systematic search identified randomized and observational studies enrolling adults with acute SVT treated with DOACs. Primary efficacy outcomes were venous thromboembolism (VTE: deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) and SVT recurrence/extension. Safety outcomes included major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB).
RESULTS: Six studies (n = 2,040; 602 DOAC-treated patients) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with fondaparinux, DOACs showed comparable short-term efficacy for VTE prevention (pooled risk ratio [RR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.44-1.99) and similar rates of SVT recurrence (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.65-2.62). Versus placebo, rivaroxaban reduced recurrence by approximately 80% (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03-1.35). In the pooled safety analysis including four studies, DOACs were associated with a 65% relative risk reduction in major or CRNMB compared with fondaparinux or low-molecular-weight heparin (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.15-0.83; I 2 = 0%). In the TROLL registry (n = 229; 74% DOAC), no major bleeding occurred among DOAC users, while 5-year cumulative VTE and SVT recurrence rates were each 15.9%. Certainty of evidence was moderate for efficacy and high for safety.
CONCLUSION: DOACs demonstrate efficacy comparable to fondaparinux and an excellent safety profile in SVT, supporting their use as a practical oral alternative. Long-term data indicate persistent thrombotic risk, suggesting potential benefit of extended low-dose prophylaxis in selected high-risk patients.