Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026
Comparative Efficacy of Insulin and Alternative Therapies for Hypertriglyceridemia-Associated Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяNetwork Meta-AnalysisСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liang Alejandro Chen, Castillo Yeison Cruz, Bruciaga Lorena M Murrieta, Murga Olivia, Patel Arti A, Monar Gabriela Flores, García-Corella José, Uribe Hector Jonan Flores, Chintamaneni Supritha, Guha Sushovan, Seyedehsan Navabi, Calderón-Martinez Ernesto
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis is associated with high triglyceride levels and may lead to significant clinical complications. Rapid TG-lowering strategies, including insulin, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), heparin, hemofiltration, and conservative management, are used in clinical practice; however, their comparative efficacy and impact on clinical outcomes remain uncertain.
METHODS: Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration (CRD420251239674), we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. Primary outcomes included TG reduction, C-reactive protein (CRP), length of stay, mortality, and organ failure. Secondary outcomes included renal and respiratory failure. Random-effects network meta-analyses estimated mean differences or relative risks with 95% confidence intervals; treatments were ranked using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA). Predefined sensitivity analyses were conducted according to study design (RCTs) and risk of bias (ROB).
RESULTS: Across predominantly observational evidence, no intervention demonstrated statistically significant superiority over insulin-based therapy for mortality, organ failure, or length of stay, and no consistent clinical benefit was observed despite differences in biochemical TG reduction. Although some interventions showed relatively favorable SUCRA rankings across selected outcomes, these findings were not consistently supported by statistically significant or high-certainty evidence. In RCT-restricted analyses, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) significantly reduced TG levels versus insulin (MD - 620.0; p = 0.03) and CRP versus conservative therapy (MD - 0.80; p < 0.01), while insulin plus heparin was associated with shorter hospital stay (MD - 1.60 days; p < 0.01). However, faster triglyceride reduction did not consistently translate into improved mortality, organ failure, ICU-related outcomes, or length of stay.
CONCLUSION: Despite improvements in biochemical markers, the clinical significance of rapid TG reduction in HTG-AP remains uncertain, as these effects were not consistently associated with improvements in mortality, organ failure, ICU-related outcomes, or hospital length of stay. Given that most available evidence was derived from nonrandomized studies and that the certainty of evidence was predominantly low or very low, adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether accelerated triglyceride lowering improves clinically meaningful patient outcomes.
METHODS: Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration (CRD420251239674), we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. Primary outcomes included TG reduction, C-reactive protein (CRP), length of stay, mortality, and organ failure. Secondary outcomes included renal and respiratory failure. Random-effects network meta-analyses estimated mean differences or relative risks with 95% confidence intervals; treatments were ranked using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA). Predefined sensitivity analyses were conducted according to study design (RCTs) and risk of bias (ROB).
RESULTS: Across predominantly observational evidence, no intervention demonstrated statistically significant superiority over insulin-based therapy for mortality, organ failure, or length of stay, and no consistent clinical benefit was observed despite differences in biochemical TG reduction. Although some interventions showed relatively favorable SUCRA rankings across selected outcomes, these findings were not consistently supported by statistically significant or high-certainty evidence. In RCT-restricted analyses, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) significantly reduced TG levels versus insulin (MD - 620.0; p = 0.03) and CRP versus conservative therapy (MD - 0.80; p < 0.01), while insulin plus heparin was associated with shorter hospital stay (MD - 1.60 days; p < 0.01). However, faster triglyceride reduction did not consistently translate into improved mortality, organ failure, ICU-related outcomes, or length of stay.
CONCLUSION: Despite improvements in biochemical markers, the clinical significance of rapid TG reduction in HTG-AP remains uncertain, as these effects were not consistently associated with improvements in mortality, organ failure, ICU-related outcomes, or hospital length of stay. Given that most available evidence was derived from nonrandomized studies and that the certainty of evidence was predominantly low or very low, adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether accelerated triglyceride lowering improves clinically meaningful patient outcomes.