European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
[68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT vs. mpMRI in patients with a high suspicion of prostate cancer and previous negative biopsy: head to head, parallel, prospective trial (PROSPET-BX).
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеКлиническое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lopci Egesta, Lazzeri Massimo, Saita Alberto, Saitta Cesare, Disconzi Luca, Colombo Piergiuseppe, Fasulo Vittorio, Tarullo Gianluca, Vuono Elisa, Peschechera Roberto, Zanca Roberta, Jandric Jelena, Sposta Federica Mrakic, Scapaticci Emanuele, Paciotti Marco, Hurle Rodolfo, Benetti Alessio, Avolio Pier Paolo, Cieri Miriam, Zandegiacomo Silvia, Pasini Luisa, Casale Paolo, Guazzoni Giorgio, Balzarini Luca, Laghi Andrea, Buffi Nicolò Maria, Lughezzani Giovanni
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This prospective imaging trial was designed to compare [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in parallel in men with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) after at least one previous negative biopsy (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05297162; GR-2018-12366240). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 2022 and June 2025, we enrolled 130 patients who met the inclusion criteria and completed protocol investigations. Target lesions were defined based on PI-RADS v2.1 for mpMRI and PRIMARY Score, SUVmax and SUVratio for [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT. Findings were statistically correlated with pathology results. Subsequently, we developed a nomogram to predict clinically significant PCa (csPCa), defined as International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade ≥ 2, using Boruta’s algorithm for variable selection. RESULTS: Median age in our cohort was 65.5 years (range, 50.5–82.2) and median PSA 9.7 ng/ml (range, 4–35). According to pathology, 20 patients (15.4%) had csPCa, while most had negative biopsies (95;73%). Median SUVmax and SUVratio were 3.9 (range, 1.9–49.9) and 1.5 (range, 1-17.3), respectively, with optimal cut-offs of SUVmax > 6 and SUVratio ≥ 2.8. Diagnostic accuracy for csPCa was significantly higher for PRIMARY score than for PI-RADS (92% vs. 83%; p = 0.0344). Clinical and imaging variables were significantly correlated with csPCa (p < 0.01), with PSA density, PRIMARY score, SUVratio, and PI-RADS emerging as independent predictors. Based on these findings, we developed the PRIMER (PSA density, Radiological Index, Metabolic Evaluation, Re-biopsy setting) nomogram to assess csPCa likelihood, achieving an AUC of 0.8957 in the training set. CONCLUSIONS: [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT outperformers mpMRI in the re-biopsy setting. The developed PRIMER nomogram can predict csPCa likelihood before biopsy.