MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2176/nmc.cr2012-0364

Медицинская библиотека · Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2013

Solitary epicranial neurofibroma with NF1-related germline mutation: case report.

Sugiyama Natsuki, Tsutsumi Satoshi, Akiba Chihiro, Nakanishi Hajime, Ogino Ikuko, Yasumoto Yukimasa, Arai Hajime, Ito Masanori

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 33-year-old male became aware of a painless soft mass in the left occipital region. His medical and family history were unremarkable for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) or other genetic disorders. Physical examination showed no signs of NF1. Neurological and ophthalmological examinations found no abnormality. Cranial computed tomography showed an isodense mass located subcutaneously with irregular deformities in the adjacent occipital bone. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging demonstrated that the lesion, 7.5 × 5.5 cm in diameter, was hypointense both on T1- and T2-weighted images and intensely enhanced after gadolinium infusion. The patient requested to remove the large mass. The subcutaneous tumor was well circumscribed, encapsulated, and less vascular, and resected en bloc. The histological diagnosis was neurofibroma without findings of cell atypia, whereas genomic exploration identified abnormal gains in NF1 gene, and resultant absence of neurofibromin, a protein coded on NF1 gene. Solitary neurofibromas in "clinically" non-NF1 patients may originate from the genomic changes in NF1 gene.

Для цитирования: Sugiyama Natsuki, Tsutsumi Satoshi, Akiba Chihiro, Nakanishi Hajime, Ogino Ikuko, Yasumoto Yukimasa, Arai Hajime, Ito Masanori. Solitary epicranial neurofibroma with NF1-related germline mutation: case report.. Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 2013. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.cr2012-0364.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.