American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.) · 2011
Effect of insurance type on fracture care delay.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sim Michael W, Elsissy Peter, Kim Samuel C, Bahjri Khaled, Wongworawat Montri D
Аннотация
Delays in evaluating wrist and hand fractures can lead to corrective rather than primary treatment. We conducted a study to determine if insurance status affects management of wrist and hand fractures. We hypothesized that patients who had to fulfill authorization requirements (AR) to see an orthopedist would have longer delays in orthopedic evaluation and higher rates of corrective osteotomy when compared with patients who had direct access (DA). We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients seen at an orthopedic clinic over a 4-year period. Evaluation delay and rate of corrective osteotomy were assessed. Of 916 patients, 549 had AR and 367 had DA. There was a significant (P<.001) delay in orthopedic evaluation of AR patients (mean, 21 days; SD, 20 days) vs DA patients (mean, 16 days; SD, 16 days). The age-adjusted odds ratio of corrective osteotomy in the AR group was statistically significant (P = .03) at 2.05 (95% confidence internal, 1.07-3.91). Requiring authorization to see an orthopedist introduces delay and a higher rate of corrective osteotomy among AR patients.