MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12882-023-03160-y

Медицинская библиотека · BMC nephrology · 2023

Incidence of thromboembolism in children with primary nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Wang Zhen, Tang Han-Yun, Lin Qiang, Li Xiao-Zhong

МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence of thromboembolism in children with primary nephrotic syndrome with Meta-analysis.

METHODS

Relevant studies published from January 1, 1980 to December 31, 2021 were retrieved from Pubmed, Web of science, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database(VIP) and Wangfang Database. Quality evaluation of the literatures included was conducted according to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality(AHRQ) assessment tool, followed by data extraction and Meta-analysis with software RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of seven studies involving 3675 subjects were included. The overall prevalence was 4.9% with 95% CI of 2.83 to 7.05.However, a significant heterogeneity (P < 0.001) was observed with I2 = 89%. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 3.3% with 95% CI of 1.7 to 4.9. The prevalence of arterial thromboembolism was 0.5% with 95% CI of 0.2 to 1.4.

CONCLUSION

Children with nephrotic syndrome are prone to thromboembolism, and it may lead to disability or death, therefore prevention measures is critical to decreasing the prevalence of thromboembolism.

Для цитирования: Wang Zhen, Tang Han-Yun, Lin Qiang, Li Xiao-Zhong. Incidence of thromboembolism in children with primary nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis.. BMC nephrology. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03160-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.