BMC medical imaging · 2026
The effect of head coil configuration and channel count on the quality of double inversion recovery (DIR) MRI images.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alahmadi Adnan, Alshehri Razan A, Gasem Rana A, Aljuhani Abdullah, Bedaiwi Almotazbillah, Malaih Afnan A, Alghamdi Jamaan, Alsalamah Amal, Alkhateeb Shyma M, Waggass Ghouth, Khalil Mohammad, Alhasan Mustafa S, Alshamrani Khalid M, Hendi Ali M, Aldusary Njoud, Alsharif Walaa, Hakami Norah Y, Kanbayti Ibrahem Hussain
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Double inversion recovery (DIR) MRI provides high sensitivity for detecting white matter abnormalities but suffers from reduced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to simultaneous suppression of multiple tissue signals. Head-coil configuration and channel count may influence the resulting image quality.
METHODS: Seventeen healthy subjects underwent DIR imaging on a 3-T MRI system using both 64-channel and 20-channel head/neck coils. Quantitative image quality was assessed using SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements across multiple brain regions, with comparisons performed using paired t-tests. Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) was additionally computed between registered 64-channel and 20-channel DIR images to quantify inter-coil structural image similarity. Qualitative image quality was evaluated by three experienced neuroradiologists using a 5-point rating scale for contrast, spatial resolution, and noise; inter-rater agreement was assessed using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W).
RESULTS: Quantitative analysis demonstrated significantly higher SNR and CNR values for the 64-channel coil compared with the 20-channel coil across all assessed regions (p < 0.0001). Qualitative evaluation showed that images acquired with the 64-channel coil received marginally higher mean scores for contrast, spatial resolution, and noise from all raters; inter-rater agreement was moderate-to-strong across all domains (Kendall's W = 0.33-0.89).
CONCLUSION: At 3 T, the use of a 64-channel head/neck coil provides significant quantitative improvements in DIR image quality compared with a 20-channel coil, with small but consistent advantages also observed in qualitative assessments. These findings support the use of higher-channel-count coils to mitigate SNR limitations inherent to DIR imaging. However, qualitative differences between coil configurations were modest and inter-rater agreement was moderate-to-strong by Kendall's W (W = 0.33-0.89). The clinical benefit of the 64-channel coil in pathological conditions such as multiple sclerosis or cortical dysplasia requires further investigation in patient-based studies.
METHODS: Seventeen healthy subjects underwent DIR imaging on a 3-T MRI system using both 64-channel and 20-channel head/neck coils. Quantitative image quality was assessed using SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements across multiple brain regions, with comparisons performed using paired t-tests. Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) was additionally computed between registered 64-channel and 20-channel DIR images to quantify inter-coil structural image similarity. Qualitative image quality was evaluated by three experienced neuroradiologists using a 5-point rating scale for contrast, spatial resolution, and noise; inter-rater agreement was assessed using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W).
RESULTS: Quantitative analysis demonstrated significantly higher SNR and CNR values for the 64-channel coil compared with the 20-channel coil across all assessed regions (p < 0.0001). Qualitative evaluation showed that images acquired with the 64-channel coil received marginally higher mean scores for contrast, spatial resolution, and noise from all raters; inter-rater agreement was moderate-to-strong across all domains (Kendall's W = 0.33-0.89).
CONCLUSION: At 3 T, the use of a 64-channel head/neck coil provides significant quantitative improvements in DIR image quality compared with a 20-channel coil, with small but consistent advantages also observed in qualitative assessments. These findings support the use of higher-channel-count coils to mitigate SNR limitations inherent to DIR imaging. However, qualitative differences between coil configurations were modest and inter-rater agreement was moderate-to-strong by Kendall's W (W = 0.33-0.89). The clinical benefit of the 64-channel coil in pathological conditions such as multiple sclerosis or cortical dysplasia requires further investigation in patient-based studies.