m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of Korean medical science · 2026

Publication and Retraction Activity in the Field of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Origins, Concerns, and Perspectives.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Permenov Bekzhan A, Zimba Olena, Suigenbayev Darkhan, Kocyigit Burhan Fatih

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has become a vital life-support tool in critical care, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The rapid growth of ECMO research necessitates bibliometric analysis to identify trends, key contributors, and obstacles, including concerns regarding scientific integrity, such as retractions.

METHODS: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database (search date: August 25, 2025), with the phrase "extracorporeal membrane oxygenation" searched in the title, abstract, or keywords. All English-language publications from 1958 and 2025 were covered. Data on publication trends, prominent countries, institutions, journals, authors, keywords, and citation/Altmetric Attention Scores were obtained. Retractions were detected using standardized queries on PubMed, and data on publication year, retraction year, country, and reasons were obtained.

RESULTS: A total of 26,786 ECMO-related publications were examined. The number of publications showed a significant upward trend (P < 0.001), peaking in 2022 with 240 articles. The United States was the leading country (n = 11,261), followed by Germany (n = 2,349), Italy (n = 1,756), China (n = 1,660), and the United Kingdom (n = 1,642). The ASAIO Journal was the most prolific source (n = 1,204). Harvard Medical School (n = 585) ranked first among institutions. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related papers dominated citation and altmetric impact, with the 2020 JAMA Wuhan cohort publication receiving the most citations (n = 17,423). Between 2012 and 2024, nine ECMO-related articles were retracted.

CONCLUSION: This analysis highlights the significant global growth of ECMO research, demonstrating considerable academic and social impact, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results offer valuable insights into publication trends, major contributors, and research visibility, potentially informing future research and partnerships in this field.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты