The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2010
Double-bar application decreases postoperative pain after the Nuss procedure.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nagaso Tomohisa, Miyamoto Junpei, Kokaji Kiyokazu, Yozu Ryohei, Jiang Hua, Jin HongMei, Tamaki Tamotsu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This biomechanical study aims to elucidate whether additional bar application increases postoperative pain after the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum.
METHODS: Clinical evaluation: The intensity of postoperative pain was compared between patients for whom a single-bar was used (single-bar group: n = 14) and those for whom double bars (double-bar group: n = 10) were used to correct the thoracic deformity. The evaluation was performed by referring to the frequency with which local anesthetics were self-injected in a patient-controlled anesthetic system and how many days were needed for the patients to resume ambulation. Theoretical evaluation: An original simulation system for the Nuss procedure was developed by producing 3-dimensional finite element analysis models from computed tomographic data of patients with pectus excavatum. With this system, single-bar and double-bar placement was simulated separately for the thorax models of the double-bar group. The stresses occurring on the thoraces were then compared between the two situations.
RESULTS: Clinical evaluation: Self-injection of local anesthetic was more frequent for the single-bar group than for the double-bar group; single-bar patients restarted ambulation later than the double-bar group. Theoretical evaluation: Stresses on the thoraces were smaller when double bars were applied than when a single bar was applied.
CONCLUSIONS: Performing double-bar placement decreases postoperative pain. Therefore, surgeons should not hesitate to perform double-bar correction in patients in whom the deformity extends to multiple intercostal spaces, requiring correction of the thorax shape at multiple sites.
METHODS: Clinical evaluation: The intensity of postoperative pain was compared between patients for whom a single-bar was used (single-bar group: n = 14) and those for whom double bars (double-bar group: n = 10) were used to correct the thoracic deformity. The evaluation was performed by referring to the frequency with which local anesthetics were self-injected in a patient-controlled anesthetic system and how many days were needed for the patients to resume ambulation. Theoretical evaluation: An original simulation system for the Nuss procedure was developed by producing 3-dimensional finite element analysis models from computed tomographic data of patients with pectus excavatum. With this system, single-bar and double-bar placement was simulated separately for the thorax models of the double-bar group. The stresses occurring on the thoraces were then compared between the two situations.
RESULTS: Clinical evaluation: Self-injection of local anesthetic was more frequent for the single-bar group than for the double-bar group; single-bar patients restarted ambulation later than the double-bar group. Theoretical evaluation: Stresses on the thoraces were smaller when double bars were applied than when a single bar was applied.
CONCLUSIONS: Performing double-bar placement decreases postoperative pain. Therefore, surgeons should not hesitate to perform double-bar correction in patients in whom the deformity extends to multiple intercostal spaces, requiring correction of the thorax shape at multiple sites.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnesthetics, LocalBiomechanical PhenomenaChildComputer SimulationFemaleFinite Element AnalysisFunnel ChestHumansMaleModels, AnatomicOrthopedic EquipmentOrthopedic ProceduresPain MeasurementPostoperative PainRecovery of FunctionSelf AdministrationStress, MechanicalTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeWalkingYoung Adult