The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2020
Recurrent post-coital bleeding: Should colposcopy still be mandatory?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tan Jeffrey H J, Jayasinghe Yasmin L, Osinski Margot J, Brotherton Julia M L, Wrede C David H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Colposcopy has been recommended for all women with recurrent post-coital bleeding (PCB) even if their cervical cytology or co-test (involving oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing and cytology) are negative.
AIMS: To determine the risk of cervical cancer and its precursors among women with recurrent PCB with negative cytology or co-test.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of two cohorts of women with PCB referred to a tertiary colposcopy clinic. Cohort (1) (n = 1846) between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2016 (cytology-based screening) and Cohort (2) (n = 215) from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 after introduction of primary HPV screening.
RESULTS: In 1217 (65.9%) women in Cohort (1) referred with negative cytology, there was one cancer (0.08%) and 22 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3)) on histopathology. In Cohort (2), there was no cancer or HSIL in 83 women with negative co-tests (negative for oncogenic HPV and cytology). False-negative cytology after a negative referral cytology or co-test was low with 2% of repeat cytology at initial colposcopy showing possible HSIL or worse.
CONCLUSIONS: Women presenting with PCB and negative cytology alone have a low risk of cancer and could have HPV testing before being triaged to colposcopy. We showed that with the assurance of a negative co-test and the low likelihood of false-negative cytology, these women could avoid colposcopy unless cervical cancer is clinically suspected. There is a need for a larger cohort study to substantiate our findings with more precision.
AIMS: To determine the risk of cervical cancer and its precursors among women with recurrent PCB with negative cytology or co-test.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of two cohorts of women with PCB referred to a tertiary colposcopy clinic. Cohort (1) (n = 1846) between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2016 (cytology-based screening) and Cohort (2) (n = 215) from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 after introduction of primary HPV screening.
RESULTS: In 1217 (65.9%) women in Cohort (1) referred with negative cytology, there was one cancer (0.08%) and 22 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3)) on histopathology. In Cohort (2), there was no cancer or HSIL in 83 women with negative co-tests (negative for oncogenic HPV and cytology). False-negative cytology after a negative referral cytology or co-test was low with 2% of repeat cytology at initial colposcopy showing possible HSIL or worse.
CONCLUSIONS: Women presenting with PCB and negative cytology alone have a low risk of cancer and could have HPV testing before being triaged to colposcopy. We showed that with the assurance of a negative co-test and the low likelihood of false-negative cytology, these women could avoid colposcopy unless cervical cancer is clinically suspected. There is a need for a larger cohort study to substantiate our findings with more precision.