MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/07448481.2025.2461600

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of American college health : J of ACH · 2025

The impact of implementing a self-administered electronic sexual health questionnaire on STI testing and diagnosis rates.

Maany Veda, Strauss Judd, Rieger Randall H, Pheysey Katherine D, Heagey Patrick

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Optimizing sexual history intake is crucial for effective STI screening and diagnosis. This study, conducted at a university health center, investigated whether implementing a self-administered electronic questionnaire focused on organ contact, compared to the conventional verbal intake method used previously, would increase the number and diversity of screening tests, and subsequently improve detection rates for chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (GC).

METHODS

The number and types of CT and GC tests ordered, along with diagnosis rates, were analyzed during the implementation of the electronic questionnaire and compared with data from the preceding four years.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in both testing frequency and CT and GC diagnoses after initiation of the new sexual history intake compared to previous years.

CONCLUSION

Implementing a self-administered electronic questionnaire for sexual history intake focusing on organ contact may enhance STI screening strategies and improve diagnostic yield for CT and GC infections.

Для цитирования: Maany Veda, Strauss Judd, Rieger Randall H, Pheysey Katherine D, Heagey Patrick. The impact of implementing a self-administered electronic sexual health questionnaire on STI testing and diagnosis rates.. Journal of American college health : J of ACH. 2025. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2025.2461600.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.