MedElevator
Войти в исследования The Journal of pediatrics · 2001
Children's school performance is not impaired by short-term administration of diphenhydramine or loratadine.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bender B G, McCormick D R, Milgrom H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a second-generation H1 antihistamine produces less sedation in children and permits greater learning in a school setting than a classic antihistamine.
STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-three 8- to 10-year-old children who had histories of seasonal allergic rhinitis but had no symptoms at the time of the study were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: placebo, diphenhydramine, or loratadine. Medications were administered on 3 of 4 study days, twice 6 hours apart, while participants attended a laboratory school. Classroom testing at the end of each school day evaluated the children's retention of curriculum material. Potential sedative effects were additionally evaluated by self-report of somnolence and computerized reaction-time testing.
RESULTS: No treatment-related differences emerged on the verbal instruction score, reading test score, reaction time, or somnolence scale.
CONCLUSIONS: Learning and response time in children attending a laboratory school were not significantly affected by either antihistamine.
STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-three 8- to 10-year-old children who had histories of seasonal allergic rhinitis but had no symptoms at the time of the study were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: placebo, diphenhydramine, or loratadine. Medications were administered on 3 of 4 study days, twice 6 hours apart, while participants attended a laboratory school. Classroom testing at the end of each school day evaluated the children's retention of curriculum material. Potential sedative effects were additionally evaluated by self-report of somnolence and computerized reaction-time testing.
RESULTS: No treatment-related differences emerged on the verbal instruction score, reading test score, reaction time, or somnolence scale.
CONCLUSIONS: Learning and response time in children attending a laboratory school were not significantly affected by either antihistamine.