DOI 10.1016/j.knee.2026.104390
The Paediatric ACL National Audit (PANA) study: a multicentre review of UK practice and adherence to BOAST guidelines.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Paediatric ACL injuries are increasingly common and present significant challenges. Inappropriate treatment can lead to long-term complications like instability, growth disturbance, and osteoarthritis. The Paediatric ACL National Audit (PANA) Study assesses UK practices and adherence to Best Orthopaedic Practice (BOAST) guidelines for managing these injuries, identifying opportunities to improve care for young patients.
METHODS
PANA was a collaborative audit of 22 hospitals in England, Wales, and Scotland, measuring adherence to BOAST guidelines in treating paediatric ACL injuries. Orthopaedic surgeons and trainees collected data through a secure online questionnaire about service provision for skeletally immature patients, including diagnostic imaging, rehabilitation, post-operative follow-up, and surgical techniques.
RESULTS
Our analysis revealed variability in adherence to the BOAST guidelines for ACL injuries in paediatric patients, with 65% of centres using acute knee pathways and 68% utilising collaborative imaging pathways. About 59% of centres conduct radiological growth monitoring, while only 30% report functional outcomes. Less than 50% report re-rupture rates, and 74% adhere to rehabilitation protocols.
CONCLUSION
The rise in ACL injuries in the paediatric population highlights the need for standardised care delivery and reporting. Following the release of the BOAST guidelines in 2022, this nationwide audit has revealed discrepancies in UK practices. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for improving patient care and outcomes by standardising and promoting best practice.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.