MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0b013e318190ddd3

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2009

Evaluation of 2 different reference planes used for the study of asymmetric facial malformations.

Pelo Sandro, Deli Roberto, Correra Pasquale, Boniello Roberto, Gasparini Giulio, Moro Alessandro

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this study was to evaluate if Frankfort plane (FH) and plane passing through the lateral semicircular canals (LS) can be used as reference planes in three-dimensional analysis.Ten patients with facial asymmetry underwent a three-dimensional computed tomography. Computed tomographic images were processed by means of a commercial software and a personal computer to obtain a three-dimensional virtual craniofacial model. The average Frankfort plane and the plane passing through the LS were identified. The distance from the above-mentioned planes to the first upper molar and upper canine cusp was measured.It was not possible to detect an FH plane in any of the patients. Right FH, left FH, average FH, and LS plane were traced. The discrepancies among reference planes were significant in cases with severe asymmetry. A minimal discrepancy was noticed in patients with light asymmetry.In patients with severe asymmetry, the LS plane results in steady, reproducible, detectable, and closer to the patient's anatomy, representing a valid reference plane for three-dimensional computed tomography analysis.

Для цитирования: Pelo Sandro, Deli Roberto, Correra Pasquale, Boniello Roberto, Gasparini Giulio, Moro Alessandro. Evaluation of 2 different reference planes used for the study of asymmetric facial malformations.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e318190ddd3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.