An examination of the efficacy and safety of fenfluramine in adults, children, and adolescents with Dravet syndrome in a real-world practice setting: A report from the Fenfluramine European Early Access Program.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To examine the efficacy and safety of fenfluramine in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) in three age groups: <6, 6-17, and ≥18 years old, treated in a real-world setting.
METHODS
Patients with DS were treated with fenfluramine in the European Union Early Access Program (EAP). Following a 28-day baseline period to establish the pretreatment monthly convulsive seizure frequency (MCSF), fenfluramine was started at a dose chosen by the treating physician and gradually titrated based on efficacy and tolerability up to a maximum of 0.7 mg/kg/day. Seizure incidence was recorded in a written diary, and adverse events (AEs) were reported at each patient visit. Cardiovascular safety was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography before treatment started and at least every 6 months thereafter.
RESULTS
A total of 149 patients have enrolled in the EAP and 63 were <6 years old, 62 were 6-17 years old, and 24 were ≥18 years old. After 3 months of treatment 62%, 53%, and 50% of patients demonstrated ≥75% reduction in MCSF in the <6, 6-17, and ≥18-year-old groups, respectively. This pattern of response was sustained through 12 months of treatment with 55%, 46%, and 80% of the <6, 6-17, and ≥18-year-old groups, respectively, experiencing a ≥75% reduction in MCSF. Most common AEs were loss of appetite (21%) and somnolence (16%). No valvular heart disease or pulmonary artery hypertension was observed.
SIGNIFICANCE: The magnitude, consistency, and durability of the response to add-on fenfluramine is consistent across age groups in patients with Dravet syndrome.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.