Journal of pediatric urology · 2025
Decision aid development for shared surgical decision-making in differences of sex development: A review of existing aids.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abdallah Aalaa S, Davies Adam, Trasatti Emma, Johnson Emilie K, Whitehead Jax
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: For some children with differences of sex development (DSD), surgical intervention is a potential treatment option to address risk of neoplasia or potential for difficulties with urination. The shared decision-making (SDM) process can be challenging for patients, families, and clinicians; decision aids (DAs) can assist in this process.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a narrative review of literature relevant to the use of DAs in surgical SDM for children with DSD, and to provide a framework for providers to create and implement DAs alongside key stakeholders.
METHODS: Primary and secondary literature searches were conducted using PubMed to generate a narrative literature review, which informed a framework incorporating aspects of community-based participatory research.
RESULTS: Six publications were included in the narrative review. Effective DAs were noted to include the following core components: (1) an overview of the process and the family's goals and values, (2) a review of nomenclature, (3) a list of topics and desired depth of discussion for each, (4) a list of questions for the medical team, and (5) management options including non-surgical management. A framework of key components and steps for future DA development was constructed based on the findings of the reviewed publications.
CONCLUSION: Our framework for a community-based participatory research approach to the development of DAs for surgical SDM for children with DSD provides a critical tool for clinicians to ensure patients and their caregivers are well-informed about their diagnoses and treatment options. Future research should further assess implementation and effectiveness of DAs.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a narrative review of literature relevant to the use of DAs in surgical SDM for children with DSD, and to provide a framework for providers to create and implement DAs alongside key stakeholders.
METHODS: Primary and secondary literature searches were conducted using PubMed to generate a narrative literature review, which informed a framework incorporating aspects of community-based participatory research.
RESULTS: Six publications were included in the narrative review. Effective DAs were noted to include the following core components: (1) an overview of the process and the family's goals and values, (2) a review of nomenclature, (3) a list of topics and desired depth of discussion for each, (4) a list of questions for the medical team, and (5) management options including non-surgical management. A framework of key components and steps for future DA development was constructed based on the findings of the reviewed publications.
CONCLUSION: Our framework for a community-based participatory research approach to the development of DAs for surgical SDM for children with DSD provides a critical tool for clinicians to ensure patients and their caregivers are well-informed about their diagnoses and treatment options. Future research should further assess implementation and effectiveness of DAs.