MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000449257

Медицинская библиотека · Urologia internationalis · 2016

Feasibility and Efficacy of a Urologic Profession Campaign on Cryptorchidism Using Internet and Social Media.

Borgmann Hendrik, Kliesch Sabine, Roth Stephan, Roth Mael, Degener Stephan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

We performed a professional campaign in Germany intending to establish the urologic profession as a competent and helpful point of contact for patients with cryptorchidism. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of this campaign and to quantify the efficacy of using Internet vs. social media.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The strategic design of the campaign comprised a strategy meeting, creation of a landing page, and targeted advertisements on Google in the form of Adwords and on Facebook in the form of sidebar ads and sponsored posts. Outcome measurements were number of impressions, homepage sessions, and downloads of an information brochure.

RESULTS

The campaign generated 2,511,923 impressions, 7,369 homepage sessions and 1,086 downloads of information brochures using a total investment budget of 7,500€. Use of Google Adwords was more efficient on outcome measurements than Facebook. A subanalysis of Facebook advertisements showed that sidebar ads and sponsored posts were equally efficient.

CONCLUSIONS

New media are an effective platform for a profession campaign. Google Adwords is a more effective and cost-efficient platform than Facebook for a targeted campaign.

Для цитирования: Borgmann Hendrik, Kliesch Sabine, Roth Stephan, Roth Mael, Degener Stephan. Feasibility and Efficacy of a Urologic Profession Campaign on Cryptorchidism Using Internet and Social Media.. Urologia internationalis. 2016. DOI: 10.1159/000449257.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.