The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022
Impact of Rapid Testing for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia in an Urban Pediatric Emergency Department.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lehto Elizabeth, Anderson Brit, Reed Jennifer, Stevenson Michelle
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the impact of rapid testing for gonorrhea (NG) and chlamydia (CT) on accuracy of treatment in adolescents in the pediatric emergency department (ED).
METHODS: Retrospective study of adolescents tested for NG and CT in the pediatric ED before and after implementation of rapid testing. Treatment during initial visit, availability of test results prior to discharge, and number of follow-up phone calls made with test results were compared. Appropriate treatment was defined per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2015 guidelines as monotherapy for CT and dual therapy for NG. Descriptive statistics were used to compare groups.
RESULTS: Rapid testing improved treatment accuracy with 522 (79.3%) patients treated appropriately in the rapid testing group compared to 478 (64.7%) patients in the batched testing group (p < .001). Inaccurate treatment was more common in the batch testing group among those who tested negative (p < .001). Among those who tested positive for NG and/or CT, phone calls were made to 54 (47.8%) patients in the rapid testing group and 129 (84.3%) patients in the batched testing group to discuss positive test results (p < .001).
CONCLUSION: Compared to batched testing, rapid testing is associated with improved accuracy of treatment of NG and CT in the pediatric ED setting. Additionally, rapid testing is associated with decreased number of phone calls to discuss positive test results.
METHODS: Retrospective study of adolescents tested for NG and CT in the pediatric ED before and after implementation of rapid testing. Treatment during initial visit, availability of test results prior to discharge, and number of follow-up phone calls made with test results were compared. Appropriate treatment was defined per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2015 guidelines as monotherapy for CT and dual therapy for NG. Descriptive statistics were used to compare groups.
RESULTS: Rapid testing improved treatment accuracy with 522 (79.3%) patients treated appropriately in the rapid testing group compared to 478 (64.7%) patients in the batched testing group (p < .001). Inaccurate treatment was more common in the batch testing group among those who tested negative (p < .001). Among those who tested positive for NG and/or CT, phone calls were made to 54 (47.8%) patients in the rapid testing group and 129 (84.3%) patients in the batched testing group to discuss positive test results (p < .001).
CONCLUSION: Compared to batched testing, rapid testing is associated with improved accuracy of treatment of NG and CT in the pediatric ED setting. Additionally, rapid testing is associated with decreased number of phone calls to discuss positive test results.