MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/13668250.2024.2446218

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of intellectual & developmental disability · 2025

Co-existence of strabismus and Down syndrome in relation to visual impairment in institutionalised adults with intellectual disabilities: Implications for vision care.

Hsieh Ching-Ju, Fang I-Mo, Lin Fu-Gong

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Visual impairment (VI) is common among people with intellectual disabilities, with rates up to 19%. This study assessed the prevalence and risk factors for ocular disorders in 341 institutionalised adults with intellectual disabilities in Taipei City from January 2016 to December 2017.

METHOD: The cross-sectional survey included visual acuity testing, cycloplegic refraction, strabismus evaluation, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, tonometry, and retinal exams.

RESULTS

Most participants were aged 20-39 years (72.9%), and 57.6% were male. VI or blindness was found in 19.7%, with strabismus (28.0%) and high myopia (23.6%) as key risk factors. Logistic regression indicated strabismus and high myopia significantly increased VI risk (OR 2.32 and 4.86). In participants with Down syndrome, the strabismus-VI association was stronger (OR 4.83 vs 1.73 without DS), with an interactive effect increasing VI risk sixfold.

CONCLUSION

Early ocular screening and targeted interventions are crucial to reduce VI risk in adults with intellectual disabilities.

Для цитирования: Hsieh Ching-Ju, Fang I-Mo, Lin Fu-Gong. Co-existence of strabismus and Down syndrome in relation to visual impairment in institutionalised adults with intellectual disabilities: Implications for vision care.. Journal of intellectual & developmental disability. 2025. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2024.2446218.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.