MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.027

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2011

Upper- and lower-extremity motor recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: an update from the national spinal cord injury database.

Marino Ralph J, Burns Stephen, Graves Daniel E, Leiby Benjamin E, Kirshblum Steven, Lammertse Daniel P

СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To present upper- (UEMS) and lower-extremity motor score (LEMS) recovery, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) change, and motor level change in persons with traumatic tetraplegia from the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS).

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort; follow-up to 1 year.

SETTING

U.S. SCIMS.

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects (N=1436; age>15y) with tetraplegia with at least 2 examinations, the first within 7 days of injury. Subjects were 80% men injured by vehicular collisions (44%), falls (30%), sports (12%), and violence (11%).

INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in AIS, UEMS, LEMS, and motor levels.

RESULTS

From a baseline of 7 days or less, 22% of subjects with AIS grade A converted to AIS grade B or better by rehabilitation discharge; and 30%, by 1 year, with 8% to AIS grade C and 7.1% to grade D. Conversion from complete to motor incomplete was not related to timing of the initial examination (P=.54) or initial neurologic level (P=.96). For AIS grade B, 34% remained motor complete, 30% became AIS grade C, and 37% became grade D by 1 year. Although 82.5% of those with AIS grade C improved to AIS grades D and E, mean 1-year UEMS score was only 35 points. UEMS scores in patients with AIS grade A increased a mean of 9 to 11 points, except for C1 to C3 and C8 to T1 motor levels (gain, 2-3 points). Motor level was unchanged or ascended in 35% and improved 1 level in 42%, 2 levels in 14%, and more than 2 levels in 9%. Motor zone of partial preservation of 2 segments or more was associated with gain of 2 or more motor levels, with a relative risk of 5.0 (95% confidence interval, 3.2-7.8; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

More patients with cervical complete spinal cord injury may be converting to AIS grade D compared with earlier reports. Motor level recovery in those with AIS grade A and UEMS recovery in those with AIS grade C injuries are potential outcomes for acute clinical trials.

Для цитирования: Marino Ralph J, Burns Stephen, Graves Daniel E, Leiby Benjamin E, Kirshblum Steven, Lammertse Daniel P. Upper- and lower-extremity motor recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: an update from the national spinal cord injury database.. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.027.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.