MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.033

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of anaesthesia · 2018

Outcome of repeat anaesthesia after investigation for perioperative anaphylaxis.

Miller J, Clough S B, Pollard R C, Misbah S A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Perioperative anaphylaxis (POA) is infrequent, but remains an important and potentially life-threatening complication of general anaesthesia. The diagnostic uncertainty surrounding the investigation of anaesthetic allergy poses numerous challenges. We aimed to inform practice by auditing the outcomes of repeat anaesthesia, after an investigation for previous POA.

METHODS

One-hundred and seventy-four subjects were investigated after suspected POA between December 2002 and August 2015. Outcome data were obtained for a total of 70 patients who underwent repeat anaesthesia after investigation in the drug-allergy clinic.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven out of the 70 patients studied underwent repeat anaesthesia without further complications. Three individuals experienced a further episode of anaphylaxis. In two cases, incomplete referral information led to the offending drugs being omitted from initial testing. The third was found to have underlying systemic mastocytosis (SM).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, the incidence of repeat anaphylaxis after a comprehensive assessment in the drug-allergy clinic for suspected POA was 4%. Important risk factors include the completeness of referral information provided to the assessor and the role of exacerbating disorders, particularly SM.

Для цитирования: Miller J, Clough S B, Pollard R C, Misbah S A. Outcome of repeat anaesthesia after investigation for perioperative anaphylaxis.. British journal of anaesthesia. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.033.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.