MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf01640895

Медицинская библиотека · Infection · 1984

The extended microbiology of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Observations during a double-blind controlled study of cephalexin twice versus four-times daily.

Tarpay M M, Chartrand S, Marks M, Cox A

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In a double-blind controlled study we compared the effectiveness of cephalexin b.i.d. versus q.i.d. in the treatment of group A streptococcal pharyngitis in 65 children. Clinical improvement was noted in 64 patients (98%) and bacteriologic cure in 60 (92%). Despite good compliance, three bacteriologic failures were noted in the q.i.d., and two in the b.i.d. treatment groups. Two of these five were carriers. Significant antibody responses were observed in 61% of the patients by at least one of three tests (ASO, anti-DNase B, Streptozyme). We also investigated the extended microbiology of streptococcal pharyngitis by looking for the presence of viruses, chlamydia and beta-lactamase producing organisms in the pharynx. Respiratory viruses were isolated concomitantly with Streptococcus pyogenes in six patients. Beta-lactamase producing bacteria were present in the pharynx of 98% of the patients at the initiation of treatment and comprised 1-98% of the total bacterial flora. The beta-lactamase producing flora did not significantly change with cephalexin therapy.

Для цитирования: Tarpay M M, Chartrand S, Marks M, Cox A. The extended microbiology of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Observations during a double-blind controlled study of cephalexin twice versus four-times daily.. Infection. 1984. DOI: 10.1007/bf01640895.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.