Schizophrenia research · 2019
Characterizing functional regional homogeneity (ReHo) as a B-SNIP psychosis biomarker using traditional and machine learning approaches.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ji Lanxin, Meda Shashwath A, Tamminga Carol A, Clementz Brett A, Keshavan Matcheri S, Sweeney John A, Gershon Elliot S, Pearlson Godfrey D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Recently, a biologically-driven psychosis classification (B-SNIP Biotypes) was derived using brain-based cognitive and electrophysiological markers. Here, we characterized a local functional-connectivity measure, regional homogeneity (ReHo), as a biomarker across Biotypes and conventional DSM diagnoses.
METHODS: Whole-brain ReHo measures of resting-state functional MRI were examined in psychosis patients and healthy controls organized by Biotype and by DSM-IV-TR diagnosis (n = 737). Group-level ANOVA and individual-level prediction models using support vector machines (SVM) were employed to evaluate the discriminative characteristics in comparisons of 1) DSM diagnostic groups, 2) Biotypes, to controls, and 3) within-proband subgroups with each other.
RESULTS: Probands grouped by Biotype versus controls showed a unique abnormality pattern: Biotype-1 displayed bidirectional ReHo differences in more widespread areas, with higher ReHo in para-hippocampus, fusiform, inferior temporal, cerebellum, thalamus and caudate, plus lower ReHo in the postcentral gyrus, middle temporal, cuneus, and middle occipital cortex; Biotype-2 and Biotype-3 showed lesser and unidirectional ReHo changes. Among diagnostic groups, only schizophrenia showed higher ReHo versus control values in the inferior/middle temporal area and fusiform gyrus. For within-patient comparisons, Biotype-1 showed characteristic ReHo when compared to Biotype-2 and Biotype-3. SVM results more accurately identified Biotypes than DSM diagnoses.
CONCLUSION: We characterized patterns of ReHo abnormalities across both Biotypes and DSM sub-groups. Both group-level statistical and machine-learning methods were more sensitive in capturing ReHo deficits in Biotypes than DSM. Overall ReHo is a robust psychosis biomarker.
METHODS: Whole-brain ReHo measures of resting-state functional MRI were examined in psychosis patients and healthy controls organized by Biotype and by DSM-IV-TR diagnosis (n = 737). Group-level ANOVA and individual-level prediction models using support vector machines (SVM) were employed to evaluate the discriminative characteristics in comparisons of 1) DSM diagnostic groups, 2) Biotypes, to controls, and 3) within-proband subgroups with each other.
RESULTS: Probands grouped by Biotype versus controls showed a unique abnormality pattern: Biotype-1 displayed bidirectional ReHo differences in more widespread areas, with higher ReHo in para-hippocampus, fusiform, inferior temporal, cerebellum, thalamus and caudate, plus lower ReHo in the postcentral gyrus, middle temporal, cuneus, and middle occipital cortex; Biotype-2 and Biotype-3 showed lesser and unidirectional ReHo changes. Among diagnostic groups, only schizophrenia showed higher ReHo versus control values in the inferior/middle temporal area and fusiform gyrus. For within-patient comparisons, Biotype-1 showed characteristic ReHo when compared to Biotype-2 and Biotype-3. SVM results more accurately identified Biotypes than DSM diagnoses.
CONCLUSION: We characterized patterns of ReHo abnormalities across both Biotypes and DSM sub-groups. Both group-level statistical and machine-learning methods were more sensitive in capturing ReHo deficits in Biotypes than DSM. Overall ReHo is a robust psychosis biomarker.