MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.005

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2018

Comparison of three surgical fixation methods for dual-bone forearm fractures in older children: A retrospective cohort study.

Zheng Wenhao, Tao Zhenyu, Chen Chunhui, Zhang Chuanxu, Zhang Hui, Feng Zhenhua, Li Hang, Cheng Liang, Cai Leyi, Chen Hua

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of dual ESIN (D-ESIN) fixation, hybrid fixation, and open reduction and dual plate (d-plate) fixation in the treatment of dual-bone forearm fractures in children aged 10-16 years.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

137 patients with dual-bone forearm fractures (48 patients in the D-ESIN group, 45 patients in the hybrid group, and 44 patients in the d-plate group) were reviewed. Duration of surgery, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative times of fluoroscopy, and duration of postoperative immobilisation were recorded. Radiographic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rate were also recorded.

RESULTS

Surgeries and incisions were significantly shorter, and less intraoperative blood loss occurred, in the hybrid group than the d-plate group (P < 0.001). The hybrid group was also characterised by less intraoperative fluoroscopy times and shorter duration of postoperative immobilisation compared with the D-ESIN group (P < 0.001). The union rate of the ulna at 3 months postoperatively was higher in the hybrid and d-plate groups than in the D-ESIN group (P = 0.003). The union rate of the radius was similar in all three groups (P = 0.403). No significant difference in the union rate of the radius or ulna was observed among groups at 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.052). The mean union time was notably later in the D-ESIN group than in the hybrid and d-plate groups. However, no significant difference in functional outcome or complication rate was observed among the three groups (P = 0.822 and P = 0.912).

CONCLUSION

Hybrid fixation was superior in terms of the duration of surgery, intraoperative use of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative immobilisation, delayed union of the ulna, and bone union time. Therefore, hybrid fixation is a safe and effective treatment for dual-bone forearm fractures in children aged 10-16 years.

Для цитирования: Zheng Wenhao, Tao Zhenyu, Chen Chunhui, Zhang Chuanxu, Zhang Hui, Feng Zhenhua, Li Hang, Cheng Liang, Cai Leyi, Chen Hua. Comparison of three surgical fixation methods for dual-bone forearm fractures in older children: A retrospective cohort study.. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.