Pediatrics · 2022
Intermittent Tiotropium Bromide for Episodic Wheezing: A Randomized Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kotaniemi-Syrjänen Anne, Klemola Timo, Koponen Petri, Jauhola Outi, Aito Henrikka, Malmström Kristiina, Malmberg L Pekka, Rahiala Eero, Sarna Seppo, Pelkonen Anna S, Mäkelä Mika J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Options to treat and prevent episodic wheezing in children are scarce. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of intermittent tiotropium bromide treatment in early childhood episodic wheezing.
METHODS: This 48-week, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted at 4 hospitals in Finland. Children aged 6 to 35 months with 2 to 4 physician-confirmed episodes of wheeze and/or shortness of breath were considered eligible. Study participants were randomly allocated to receive 1 of 3 treatments: once-daily tiotropium bromide 5 µg for 7 to 14 days during respiratory tract infections and as-needed albuterol sulfate 0.2 mg (n = 27), twice-daily fluticasone propionate 125 µg for 7 to 14 days during respiratory tract infections and as-needed albuterol sulfate 0.2 mg (n = 25), or as-needed albuterol sulfate 0.2 mg alone (n = 28). The primary outcome was efficacy, assessed as intention-to-treat by comparing the proportion of episode-free days (the days lacking symptoms or treatments) between the treatment groups.
RESULTS: The proportion of episode-free days was higher in those receiving intermittent tiotropium bromide (median 97% [interquartile range, 93% to 99%]) than in those receiving intermittent fluticasone propionate (87% [78% to 93%], P = .002), or with as-needed albuterol sulfate alone (88% [79% to 95%], P = .003). Adjustment with allergic sensitization, the baseline number of physician-confirmed episodes of wheeze and/or shortness of breath, or short-course glucocorticoid treatment in the 2 weeks before the enrollment, did not affect the result. Intervention-related adverse events were not seen.
CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent tiotropium bromide treatment may be an effective alternative to current therapies for episodic wheezing. Before implementation of use, further research on safety and efficacy is indicated.
METHODS: This 48-week, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted at 4 hospitals in Finland. Children aged 6 to 35 months with 2 to 4 physician-confirmed episodes of wheeze and/or shortness of breath were considered eligible. Study participants were randomly allocated to receive 1 of 3 treatments: once-daily tiotropium bromide 5 µg for 7 to 14 days during respiratory tract infections and as-needed albuterol sulfate 0.2 mg (n = 27), twice-daily fluticasone propionate 125 µg for 7 to 14 days during respiratory tract infections and as-needed albuterol sulfate 0.2 mg (n = 25), or as-needed albuterol sulfate 0.2 mg alone (n = 28). The primary outcome was efficacy, assessed as intention-to-treat by comparing the proportion of episode-free days (the days lacking symptoms or treatments) between the treatment groups.
RESULTS: The proportion of episode-free days was higher in those receiving intermittent tiotropium bromide (median 97% [interquartile range, 93% to 99%]) than in those receiving intermittent fluticasone propionate (87% [78% to 93%], P = .002), or with as-needed albuterol sulfate alone (88% [79% to 95%], P = .003). Adjustment with allergic sensitization, the baseline number of physician-confirmed episodes of wheeze and/or shortness of breath, or short-course glucocorticoid treatment in the 2 weeks before the enrollment, did not affect the result. Intervention-related adverse events were not seen.
CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent tiotropium bromide treatment may be an effective alternative to current therapies for episodic wheezing. Before implementation of use, further research on safety and efficacy is indicated.