Right ventricular systolic function in hypoplastic left heart syndrome: A comparison of manual and automated software to measure fractional area change.

BACKGROUND

Quantitative echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function is important in children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). The aim of this study was to examine the repeatability of different echocardiographic techniques, both manual and automated, to measure fractional area change (FAC) in patients with HLHS and to correlate these measurements with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived ejection fraction (EF).

METHODS

Fifty-one children with HLHS underwent transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac MRI under the same general anesthetic as part of routine inter-stage assessment. FAC was measured from the apical four-chamber view using three different techniques: velocity vector imaging (VVI) (Syngo USWP 3.0; Siemens Healthineers), QLAB (Q-lab R 10.0; Philips Healthcare), and manual endocardial contour tracing (Xcelera, Philips Healthcare). Intra- and inter-observer variability was calculated using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). FAC was correlated with MRI EF calculated using a single standard method.

RESULTS

Fractional area change had a good correlation with MRI-derived EF with an R value for VVI, QLAB, and manual methods of .7, .6, and .4, respectively. Intra- and inter-observer variability for FAC was good for automated echocardiographic methods (ICC>.85) but worse for manual method particularly inter-observer variability of FAC and end-systolic area. Both automated techniques tended to produce higher FAC values compared with manual measurements (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Automation improves the repeatability of FAC in HLHS. There are some differences between automated software in terms of correlation with MRI-derived EF. Measurement bias and wide limits of agreement mean that the same echocardiographic technique should be used during the follow-up of individual patients.