The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2006
In vivo selection during ofloxacin therapy of Escherichia coli with combined topoisomerase mutations that confer high resistance to ofloxacin but susceptibility to nalidixic acid.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cattoir Vincent, Lesprit Philippe, Lascols Christine, Denamur Erik, Legrand Patrick, Soussy Claude-James, Cambau Emmanuelle
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate quinolone resistance mechanisms in an Escherichia coli clinical isolate (Ar2) resistant to ofloxacin but susceptible to nalidixic acid selected after 10 days of ofloxacin therapy in a patient with prostatitis.
METHODS: Molecular typing (ERIC-PCR and RAPD), antibiotic susceptibility and gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE QRDR sequences were compared for E. coli Ar2 and a wild-type E. coli (Ar1) isolated 2 months earlier in the same patient. Ofloxacin-resistant mutants were selected in vitro in order to reproduce the mutations observed and the original phenotype.
RESULTS: The two strains were similar with regard to antibiotic susceptibility except quinolones and for ERIC-PCR and RAPD patterns, suggesting a clonal relationship and acquisition of quinolone resistance by chromosomal mutation. Quinolone MICs were 3, 0.12, 0.05 and 0.02 mg/L of nalidixic acid, ofloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively, for E. coli Ar1 and 6, 32, 8 and 1 mg/L, respectively, for E. coli Ar2. The strain Ar2 harboured two substitutions, Gly-81-->Asp in GyrA and Ser-80-->Arg in ParC. Introduction into E. coli Ar2 of the wild-type gyrA fully complemented fluoroquinolone resistance. Although the strain was not a hypermutator, ofloxacin first-step resistant mutants with gyrA mutations were easily obtained from E. coli Ar1 and 25% of them were at codon 81. In vitro stepwise combination of Gly-81-->Asp in GyrA and Ser-80-->Arg in ParC reproduced the original phenotype in E. coli KL16.
CONCLUSIONS: A double topoisomerase mutant was selected in vivo by 10 days ofloxacin. The mutations were originally combined for a result of ofloxacin resistance but nalidixic acid susceptibility.
METHODS: Molecular typing (ERIC-PCR and RAPD), antibiotic susceptibility and gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE QRDR sequences were compared for E. coli Ar2 and a wild-type E. coli (Ar1) isolated 2 months earlier in the same patient. Ofloxacin-resistant mutants were selected in vitro in order to reproduce the mutations observed and the original phenotype.
RESULTS: The two strains were similar with regard to antibiotic susceptibility except quinolones and for ERIC-PCR and RAPD patterns, suggesting a clonal relationship and acquisition of quinolone resistance by chromosomal mutation. Quinolone MICs were 3, 0.12, 0.05 and 0.02 mg/L of nalidixic acid, ofloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively, for E. coli Ar1 and 6, 32, 8 and 1 mg/L, respectively, for E. coli Ar2. The strain Ar2 harboured two substitutions, Gly-81-->Asp in GyrA and Ser-80-->Arg in ParC. Introduction into E. coli Ar2 of the wild-type gyrA fully complemented fluoroquinolone resistance. Although the strain was not a hypermutator, ofloxacin first-step resistant mutants with gyrA mutations were easily obtained from E. coli Ar1 and 25% of them were at codon 81. In vitro stepwise combination of Gly-81-->Asp in GyrA and Ser-80-->Arg in ParC reproduced the original phenotype in E. coli KL16.
CONCLUSIONS: A double topoisomerase mutant was selected in vivo by 10 days ofloxacin. The mutations were originally combined for a result of ofloxacin resistance but nalidixic acid susceptibility.