Acta neurochirurgica · 2016
Hydrocephalus in vein of Galen malformation: etiologies and therapeutic management implications.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Meila Dan, Grieb Dominik, Melber Katharina, Jacobs Collin, Maslehaty Homajoun, Petridis Athanasios, El Habony Rashad, Lanfermann Heinrich, Scholz Martin, Brassel Friedhelm
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Up to now, only little is known about hydrocephalus (HC) in vein of Galen malformation (VGM). We want to present the different etiologies and our long-term experience (1992-2015) in the management of HC.
METHODS: Out of 44 treated children with VGM, we retrospectively reviewed all cases with HC. We analyzed the etiologies, our treatment results and complications.
RESULTS: Twenty-one children (48 %) presented either with HC or developed it over time. In 21 % of those cases, high venous pressure was presumably the sole cause. Until 2009, seven of them received ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting; six of those resulted in severe postoperative complications. The remaining children have been treated successfully by endovascular embolization. Five out of the 44 children (11 %) developed HC after intraventricular hemorrhage. In four cases, those children were treated with positive results by using transient external ventricular drainages. In one case a VP shunt with highest valve pressure was inserted. Another four children (9 %) presented with aqueductal stenosis-related HC caused by either dilated venous outflow or space-occupying coil masses after embolization. The latter case was successfully treated by ventriculocisternostomy, whereas endovascular treatment decreased the venous outflow in size and thus resolved the HC in the other cases. In the remaining cases (7 %), atrophy due to melting brain syndrome led to HC ex vacuo.
CONCLUSIONS: HC in VGM is a common phenomenon with several etiologies requiring different treatments. In most cases, embolization of the VGM as sole treatment is completely sufficient in order to decrease high venous pressure. However, certain other causes of HC should be treated in an interdisciplinary setting by specialized neurosurgeons.
METHODS: Out of 44 treated children with VGM, we retrospectively reviewed all cases with HC. We analyzed the etiologies, our treatment results and complications.
RESULTS: Twenty-one children (48 %) presented either with HC or developed it over time. In 21 % of those cases, high venous pressure was presumably the sole cause. Until 2009, seven of them received ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting; six of those resulted in severe postoperative complications. The remaining children have been treated successfully by endovascular embolization. Five out of the 44 children (11 %) developed HC after intraventricular hemorrhage. In four cases, those children were treated with positive results by using transient external ventricular drainages. In one case a VP shunt with highest valve pressure was inserted. Another four children (9 %) presented with aqueductal stenosis-related HC caused by either dilated venous outflow or space-occupying coil masses after embolization. The latter case was successfully treated by ventriculocisternostomy, whereas endovascular treatment decreased the venous outflow in size and thus resolved the HC in the other cases. In the remaining cases (7 %), atrophy due to melting brain syndrome led to HC ex vacuo.
CONCLUSIONS: HC in VGM is a common phenomenon with several etiologies requiring different treatments. In most cases, embolization of the VGM as sole treatment is completely sufficient in order to decrease high venous pressure. However, certain other causes of HC should be treated in an interdisciplinary setting by specialized neurosurgeons.